Hi Paweł — following the contributing guidelines ("new skills → open an issue first"), I'd like to propose adding two skills to pm-marketing-growth. Both are skills I built and use in my own work; source is in brainsparker/skills.
Proposed skills
bold-claim (positioning)
Finds the single contested sentence that drives a product's GTM motion — a claim a competitor would push back on, not a tagline. The skill researches the competitive landscape, generates 5–7 claim candidates across six archetypes (category, antagonist, reframe, etc.), scores them against a 25-point sharpness rubric, and produces a messaging doc anchored on the winning claim (the claim, the antagonist, proof points, timing, one-liners).
Source: skills/bold-claim/SKILL.md
claim-review (alignment review)
A PM-lens review of a PR, spec, or shipped feature: does what this actually does match what we claimed it does? Scores against five dimensions (claim-aligned, surface-honest, felt-value, scope-honest, voice-aligned) and names concrete gaps with quoted lines. It composes with bold-claim — if a bold-claim doc exists, it becomes the alignment yardstick — which is why I'm proposing both for the same plugin (keeping the reference intra-plugin per the design rules).
Source: skills/claim-review/SKILL.md
Why pm-marketing-growth
They sit next to the existing positioning-ideas and value-prop-statements skills: bold-claim goes one level deeper on positioning (a single contested claim with a scoring rubric), and claim-review closes the loop by checking shipped work against that positioning.
If you're open to it
I'd submit a PR that:
- Rewrites both skills in neutral voice to match the repo's conventions (frontmatter with
name + description incl. trigger phrases, name matching directory)
- Updates the plugin README and description, skill/command counts in the root README and
marketplace.json
- Bumps versions across all manifests per the versioning policy
- Passes
python3 validate_plugins.py
Happy to adjust scope, naming, or plugin placement — whatever fits the marketplace best.
Hi Paweł — following the contributing guidelines ("new skills → open an issue first"), I'd like to propose adding two skills to pm-marketing-growth. Both are skills I built and use in my own work; source is in brainsparker/skills.
Proposed skills
bold-claim(positioning)Finds the single contested sentence that drives a product's GTM motion — a claim a competitor would push back on, not a tagline. The skill researches the competitive landscape, generates 5–7 claim candidates across six archetypes (category, antagonist, reframe, etc.), scores them against a 25-point sharpness rubric, and produces a messaging doc anchored on the winning claim (the claim, the antagonist, proof points, timing, one-liners).
Source: skills/bold-claim/SKILL.md
claim-review(alignment review)A PM-lens review of a PR, spec, or shipped feature: does what this actually does match what we claimed it does? Scores against five dimensions (claim-aligned, surface-honest, felt-value, scope-honest, voice-aligned) and names concrete gaps with quoted lines. It composes with
bold-claim— if a bold-claim doc exists, it becomes the alignment yardstick — which is why I'm proposing both for the same plugin (keeping the reference intra-plugin per the design rules).Source: skills/claim-review/SKILL.md
Why pm-marketing-growth
They sit next to the existing
positioning-ideasandvalue-prop-statementsskills:bold-claimgoes one level deeper on positioning (a single contested claim with a scoring rubric), andclaim-reviewcloses the loop by checking shipped work against that positioning.If you're open to it
I'd submit a PR that:
name+descriptionincl. trigger phrases, name matching directory)marketplace.jsonpython3 validate_plugins.pyHappy to adjust scope, naming, or plugin placement — whatever fits the marketplace best.