What would you like to be added: A helper mechanism for validating and exploring YAML configuration fields, ideally with autocomplete and schema validation support.
Why is this needed:
- Context: When working with the ECS
UpdateService API, configuration errors can be surprisingly hard to detect, especially when they involve incorrect field names that are silently ignored or not clearly validated
Example
deploymentConfiguration:
deploymentStrategy: BLUE_GREEN # Wrong field name, it should be strategy
There is no immediate feedback, the API does not clearly indicate the mismatch which led to significant debugging time. At one point, it even caused confusion for me about whether UpdateService API supports changing deployment strategy at all
My implication for the above example is there should be a way to enforce and robust the way we write config.
Potential solution: Leverage YAML schema validation via JSON Schema, which is already supported by tools like the Red Hat YAML Language Server
How it works ?: By adding this line at the top of a YAML file:
# yaml-language-server: $schema=<path-to-json-schema-file>
How to generate JSON schema ?: By using package github.com/invopop/jsonschema, we can generate a JSON schema like this
// Generate schema
r := &jsonschema.Reflector{
KeyNamer: func(s string) string {
if len(s) == 0 {
return s
}
return strings.ToLower(s[:1]) + s[1:] // lowercase the first character
},
RequiredFromJSONSchemaTags: true,
}
schema := r.Reflect(&ecs.CreateServiceInput{})
output, _ := json.MarshalIndent(schema, "", " ")
file, err := os.Create("output.json")
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
defer file.Close()
file.Write(output)
Example result
Should we create and maintain something like this ? https://pipecd.dev/jsonschema/plugins/ecs/service.json
I would love to have discussion about this
What would you like to be added: A helper mechanism for validating and exploring YAML configuration fields, ideally with autocomplete and schema validation support.
Why is this needed:
UpdateServiceAPI, configuration errors can be surprisingly hard to detect, especially when they involve incorrect field names that are silently ignored or not clearly validatedExample
There is no immediate feedback, the API does not clearly indicate the mismatch which led to significant debugging time. At one point, it even caused confusion for me about whether
UpdateServiceAPI supports changing deployment strategy at allMy implication for the above example is there should be a way to enforce and robust the way we write config.
Potential solution: Leverage YAML schema validation via JSON Schema, which is already supported by tools like the Red Hat YAML Language Server
How it works ?: By adding this line at the top of a YAML file:
# yaml-language-server: $schema=<path-to-json-schema-file>How to generate JSON schema ?: By using package
github.com/invopop/jsonschema, we can generate a JSON schema like thisExample result
Should we create and maintain something like this ?
https://pipecd.dev/jsonschema/plugins/ecs/service.jsonI would love to have discussion about this