Skip to content

VariableScopeCheck: Disallow D and ED in pkg_postinst #523

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ulm
Copy link
Contributor

@ulm ulm commented Jan 14, 2023

According to QA policy PG 107:
https://projects.gentoo.org/qa/policy-guide/ebuild-format.html#pg0107

(Note that "pkg_postinst" was misspelt as "pkg_postint", so it would have warned already.)

According to QA policy PG 107:
https://projects.gentoo.org/qa/policy-guide/ebuild-format.html#pg0107

(Note that "pkg_postinst" was misspelt as "pkg_postint", so it would
have warned already.)

Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <[email protected]>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 14, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 81.05% // Head: 81.05% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (8ce66c9) compared to base (d2a5afc).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #523   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.05%   81.05%           
=======================================
  Files          56       56           
  Lines        8125     8125           
  Branches     1821     1821           
=======================================
  Hits         6586     6586           
  Misses       1440     1440           
  Partials       99       99           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/pkgcheck/checks/codingstyle.py 73.87% <ø> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@arthurzam arthurzam linked an issue Jan 14, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@ulm ulm deleted the variablescope branch January 14, 2023 20:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update ${D} usage when PMS changes
2 participants