Package in toltec

[NickHu]

Hi, thanks for your amazing work on this! I was amazed that someone implemented damage tracking.

Would you be open to packaging the binary and shared libraries in toltec? It would be nice to have a more coherent reMarkable ecosystem.

[Eeems]

If anybody wants some help creating a package for this in toltec, feel free to reach out on the community discord.

[pl-semiotics]

Sure, I'd be happy to! The only thing that gives me pause is that since I don't use toltec at the moment, I won't necessarily be the first to notice if anything goes wrong (oh, the eternal distro packaging issue...).

This seems like one of a few reasonable ways to distribute everything using the shared library versions of things as well, which might be nice for sharing at some point. If nobody else does the packaging, I'll take a look this weekend or next.

[Eeems]

Sure, I'd be happy to! The only thing that gives me pause is that since I don't use toltec at the moment, I won't necessarily be the first to notice if anything goes wrong (oh, the eternal distro packaging issue...).

Well, we don't push packages to stable that are broken, so worst case is that stable has an out of date, but working package.

This seems like one of a few reasonable ways to distribute everything using the shared library versions of things as well, which might be nice for sharing at some point. If nobody else does the packaging, I'll take a look this weekend or next.

Poke me on discord if you need any help. I'll try my best to reply in a timely manner, or point you to someone else who can help.

[pl-semiotics]

@Eeems I may have a chance to take a look at this shortly (I was waiting for the next release, which I thought I had sent out binaries asking for people to test on, but apparently this did not quite work---trying again today); could you point me at the discord in question?

[Eeems]

https://discord.gg/JSSGnFY