-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Open
Description
@todo π οΈ
- tasks here are to be done by our team. candidate(s) please skip and read
@infosection@inputπ¦list of selected candidate(s)from application formΒ #2- write trial phase description and share a recorded screencast to explain it
- write trial phase description in
@infosection below@outputπ see@infosection below
- add materials to describe the website project
@outputβ see@infosection below
- add screencast to explain our project management system to chosen candidates
- write trial phase description in
@inputπ¦dat-ecosystem project screencast@inputπ¦github issue management system@inputπ¦example project screencast "wizardamigos"@inputπ¦example project screencast "datdot-ui"@inputπ¦little checklist and summary- introduce chosen candidates to the trial phase tasks
- work with candidates during trial phase towards trial phase results
- evaluate trial phase results to choose partner(s)
- make final initial project plan and inform chosen partner(s) to proceed with the gig
*@outputπ¦final initial project plan
*@outputβlist of chosen partner(s)
@info π
- the trial phase candidates and their issues to work on during the next 48 hours are
- all participatants who submit a well defined project roadmap will be payed
20 USD
dat-ecosystem project input resources π
evaluation of trial phase π
- β did candidates deliver a proper plan to earn the trial phase reward of π²20 USD π°
- β is the plan well structured and understandable by us
- β is the main issues linked in a comment of the candidate's given trial phase issue for easy discovery by us
- β are all the issues the candidate made directly or indirectly linked to their main issue
- β are all issues organized in the style of our github issues project task management system
- β did the candidate estimate times for their tasks
- β does the main issue list high level tasks to provide a good overview
- β are inputs and outputs properly linked
- β do all inputs lead to outputs which are used in other tasks as inputs until eventually the final outputs are produced
- β do outputs and inputs fit well together or are there missing steps or missing intermediate output documents
- β is each task well described in the info section in terms of what will happen or does it leave us with many open questions
- β did the candidate record a screencast to explain their plan well
- β does the plan reflect a similar understanding of the dat-ecosystem that we have based on the input resources including 8 years of history
- β are all trial phase input resources included as task inputs in the candidate's plan
- β did the candidate provide additional thoughts/notes/links/screenshots/sketches/etc... or any other inspiration for specific parts of the project plan
- β did the candidate include all the β outputs mentioned in the trial phase issue or adapted them to something similarly useful
- the outputs mentioned were:
@outputβwebsite UI/UX specification & wireframes@outputβdat-ecosystem design system@outputβlist of re-usable web components@outputβimplemented website@outputβlink to one or multiple final screencasts (each 3-5 minutes max) where the candidate walks us through the entire project plan
- the outputs mentioned were:
- β does the proposed website structure represent all aspects of the dat-ecosystem input resources
- β did the candidate work with us during the trial phase and used our feedback to improve the plan
- β did they use worklog issue comments to post their questions
- β did they improve the plan structure based on our feedback
- β did the candidate mention time spent working on the task when posting a worklog
- β does it seem as if the plan can be executed in 4-8 weeks
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels