Skip to content

Use AttributePersistenceProvider/SafeAttributePersistenceProvider for the storage context for server cluster interfaces #37924

Open
@andy31415

Description

@andy31415

This is in reference to #37851 (comment)

from #37851

We passed in PersistentStorageDelegate as a storage context for ServerClusterContext.

instead we should use an attribute persistence provider, since those are the interfaces that are supposed to be available to clusters to read/write their data.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    • Status

      No status

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions