Description
Reproduction steps
To step away from Ember, there are still a lot of files using it in some way or another. The current lint workflow from #38006 aims to evaluate the usage of ember in current files and provide a way to detect it, by slowly removing exclusions. The symbols found that use ember as of today, May 20th 2025, are inside the following file, symbols.txt, from which the following list seems like a good place to start:
examples/fabric-bridge-app/fabric-bridge-common/src/BridgedAdministratorCommissioning.cpp:33examples/fabric-sync/bridge/src/BridgedAdministratorCommissioning.cpp:33examples/tv-app/linux/main.cpp:47src/app/app-platform/ContentAppPlatform.cpp:289src/app/util/attribute-storage.h:218src/darwin/Framework/CHIP/ServerEndpoint/MTRServerEndpoint.mm:327examples/energy-management-app/energy-management-common/common/src/EnergyManagementAppCommonMain.cpp:298examples/energy-management-app/energy-management-common/device-energy-management/src/device-energy-management-mode.cpp:96src/app/app-platform/ContentAppPlatform.cpp:246src/app/util/attribute-storage.cpp:224src/app/util/attribute-storage.cpp:281src/app/util/attribute-storage.cpp:982src/data-model-providers/codegen/CodegenDataModelProvider.cpp:302src/data-model-providers/codegen/CodegenDataModelProvider.cpp:396
This is because all of these places apparently have ember only in some comments, however, we still must check thoroughly if some indirect call to ember is taking place or not and either exclude it (but maybe add information) or tackle it.
Darwin might need to migrate the provider later on, albeit dynamicdispatcher should do it for sure.
For more info regarding the creation of this issue, please check the following: #38006
Platform
core (please add to version below)
Platform Version(s)
1.0.1
Type
YAML tested
(Optional) If manually tested please explain why this is only manually tested
No response
Anything else?
No response
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Type
Projects
Status