Skip to content

Fix terminology deviations #66

Open
@rameshpolishetti

Description

@rameshpolishetti

Current behavior (how does the issue manifest):
As part of the issue #65 discussion, concern has been raised by @mellistibco on the terminology used in the rules repository. For example trigger should be used to describe an input source into an action, instead of channel/etc.

The objective of this issue to Identify such terminology deviations across Rule repository and fix.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions