Skip to content

Fix default value for rewindEpochTimeInSecondsOverride in constructors #472

Fix default value for rewindEpochTimeInSecondsOverride in constructors

Fix default value for rewindEpochTimeInSecondsOverride in constructors #472

Triggered via push March 7, 2026 02:07
Status Failure
Total duration 1h 4m 40s
Artifacts 19
Matrix: Clients / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Controller / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Integrations / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Internal / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Router / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Server / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: StaticAnalysis
ValidateGradleWrapper
13s
ValidateGradleWrapper
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsFailureAlert
4s
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsFailureAlert
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

69 errors
StaticAnalysis (17)
Process completed with exit code 1.
AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.testThrottlingDoesNotBlockBelowQuota: clients/venice-push-job/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/hadoop/task/datawriter/AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.java#L167
java.lang.AssertionError: Messages should not be throttled when below quota, elapsed: 217ms expected [true] but found [false]
AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.testThrottlingDoesNotBlockBelowQuota: clients/venice-push-job/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/hadoop/task/datawriter/AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.java#L167
java.lang.AssertionError: Messages should not be throttled when below quota, elapsed: 245ms expected [true] but found [false]
AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.testThrottlingDoesNotBlockBelowQuota: clients/venice-push-job/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/hadoop/task/datawriter/AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.java#L167
java.lang.AssertionError: Messages should not be throttled when below quota, elapsed: 213ms expected [true] but found [false]
AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.testThrottlingDoesNotBlockBelowQuota: clients/venice-push-job/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/hadoop/task/datawriter/AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.java#L167
java.lang.AssertionError: Messages should not be throttled when below quota, elapsed: 301ms expected [true] but found [false]
AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.testThrottlingDoesNotBlockBelowQuota: clients/venice-push-job/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/hadoop/task/datawriter/AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.java#L167
java.lang.AssertionError: Messages should not be throttled when below quota, elapsed: 636ms expected [true] but found [false]
Clients / UT & CodeCov (11)
Process completed with exit code 1.
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testDataValidationCheckPointing[3](UNSORTED, AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: logNotifier.completed( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, <Capturing argument>, "STANDBY" ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.notifier.LogNotifier.completed(LogNotifier.java:27) However, there were exactly 912 interactions with this mock: logNotifier.started( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportStarted$1(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:117) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{2} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{3} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{4} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{5} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{6} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{7} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{8} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{9} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{10} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{11} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{12} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{13} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{14} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{15} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{16} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$re
ParticipantStoreConsumptionTaskTest.testOverallRunFlow: clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/ParticipantStoreConsumptionTaskTest.java#L85
Wanted but not invoked: storeIngestionService.getIngestingTopicsWithVersionStatusNotOnline(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.ParticipantStoreConsumptionTaskTest.testOverallRunFlow(ParticipantStoreConsumptionTaskTest.java:85) Actually, there were zero interactions with this mock.
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testDataValidationCheckPointing[3](UNSORTED, AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: logNotifier.completed( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, <Capturing argument>, "STANDBY" ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.notifier.LogNotifier.completed(LogNotifier.java:27) However, there were exactly 912 interactions with this mock: logNotifier.started( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportStarted$1(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:117) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{2} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{3} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{4} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{5} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{6} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{7} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{8} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{9} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{10} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{11} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{12} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{13} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{14} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{15} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_4379ecf55c_763cc3a4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{16} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$re
ParticipantStoreConsumptionTaskTest.testOverallRunFlow: clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/ParticipantStoreConsumptionTaskTest.java#L85
Wanted but not invoked: storeIngestionService.getIngestingTopicsWithVersionStatusNotOnline(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.ParticipantStoreConsumptionTaskTest.testOverallRunFlow(ParticipantStoreConsumptionTaskTest.java:85) Actually, there were zero interactions with this mock.
InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.testInstanceMeasurement: internal/venice-common/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/memory/InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.java#L49
java.lang.AssertionError: Class KafkaKey has a memoryAllocatedPerInstance (37.37856) which is too far from the predictedUsage (40); delta: 0.066; maxAllowedDelta: 0.027. No more attempts left.
InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.testInstanceMeasurement: internal/venice-common/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/memory/InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.java#L49
java.lang.AssertionError: Class KafkaKey has a memoryAllocatedPerInstance (37.37856) which is too far from the predictedUsage (40); delta: 0.066; maxAllowedDelta: 0.027. No more attempts left.
TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.testUpdateAndGetAndDeleteAcl: services/venice-controller/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/controller/TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.java#L123
org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.UnfinishedStubbingException: Unfinished stubbing detected here: -> at com.linkedin.venice.controller.TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.testUpdateAndGetAndDeleteAcl(TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.java:123) E.g. thenReturn() may be missing. Examples of correct stubbing: when(mock.isOk()).thenReturn(true); when(mock.isOk()).thenThrow(exception); doThrow(exception).when(mock).someVoidMethod(); Hints: 1. missing thenReturn() 2. you are trying to stub a final method, which is not supported 3. you are stubbing the behaviour of another mock inside before 'thenReturn' instruction is completed
TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.testUpdateAndGetAndDeleteAcl: services/venice-controller/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/controller/TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.java#L123
org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.UnfinishedStubbingException: Unfinished stubbing detected here: -> at com.linkedin.venice.controller.TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.testUpdateAndGetAndDeleteAcl(TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.java:123) E.g. thenReturn() may be missing. Examples of correct stubbing: when(mock.isOk()).thenReturn(true); when(mock.isOk()).thenThrow(exception); doThrow(exception).when(mock).someVoidMethod(); Hints: 1. missing thenReturn() 2. you are trying to stub a final method, which is not supported 3. you are stubbing the behaviour of another mock inside before 'thenReturn' instruction is completed
AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.testThrottlingDoesNotBlockBelowQuota: clients/venice-push-job/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/hadoop/task/datawriter/AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.java#L167
java.lang.AssertionError: Messages should not be throttled when below quota, elapsed: 277ms expected [true] but found [false]
AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.testThrottlingDoesNotBlockBelowQuota: clients/venice-push-job/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/hadoop/task/datawriter/AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.java#L167
java.lang.AssertionError: Messages should not be throttled when below quota, elapsed: 278ms expected [true] but found [false]
AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.testThrottlingDoesNotBlockBelowQuota: clients/venice-push-job/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/hadoop/task/datawriter/AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.java#L167
java.lang.AssertionError: Messages should not be throttled when below quota, elapsed: 315ms expected [true] but found [false]
AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.testThrottlingDoesNotBlockBelowQuota: clients/venice-push-job/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/hadoop/task/datawriter/AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.java#L167
java.lang.AssertionError: Messages should not be throttled when below quota, elapsed: 289ms expected [true] but found [false]
AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.testThrottlingDoesNotBlockBelowQuota: clients/venice-push-job/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/hadoop/task/datawriter/AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.java#L167
java.lang.AssertionError: Messages should not be throttled when below quota, elapsed: 575ms expected [true] but found [false]
Clients / UT & CodeCov (17)
Process completed with exit code 1.
StatTrackingStoreClientTest.testMultiGet: clients/venice-thin-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/client/store/StatTrackingStoreClientTest.java#L277
java.lang.AssertionError: Success Key Ratio should be positive expected [true] but found [false]
AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.testThrottlingDoesNotBlockBelowQuota: clients/venice-push-job/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/hadoop/task/datawriter/AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.java#L167
java.lang.AssertionError: Messages should not be throttled when below quota, elapsed: 306ms expected [true] but found [false]
Clients / UT & CodeCov (8)
Process completed with exit code 1.
SITWithSAwarePWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testResetPartition[0](AA_ON): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithSAwarePWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: abstractStorageEngine.put( 1, [(byte) 0x01, (byte) 0x4B, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x79, (byte) 0x46, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x50, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x6E, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x34, (byte) 0x34, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x39, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x36, (byte) 0x32, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x36, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x39, (byte) 0x35], java.nio.HeapByteBuffer[pos=0 lim=17 cap=17] ); Wanted 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.store.AbstractStorageEngine.put(AbstractStorageEngine.java:478) But was 1 time: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.put(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:39)
SITWithSAwarePWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testResetPartition[0](AA_ON): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithSAwarePWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: abstractStorageEngine.put( 1, [(byte) 0x01, (byte) 0x4B, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x79, (byte) 0x46, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x50, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x6E, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x34, (byte) 0x34, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x39, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x36, (byte) 0x32, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x36, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x39, (byte) 0x35], java.nio.HeapByteBuffer[pos=0 lim=17 cap=17] ); Wanted 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.store.AbstractStorageEngine.put(AbstractStorageEngine.java:478) But was 1 time: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.put(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:39)
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsFailureAlert
Process completed with exit code 1.

Artifacts

Produced during runtime
Name Size Digest
StaticAnalysis Expired
956 KB
sha256:28ab119ad689eeda2b1c6eb9e4791a61ab133719d93efcdcb7901d2e5a3ae94e
clients-jdk11 Expired
2.34 MB
sha256:490824f8e04f4a153577ee44f9fd0ea71e5098a629e121ab48eda65ebacee2e8
clients-jdk17 Expired
2.36 MB
sha256:44f4b210a83581f4cfdccc157e1ed71f4f008da8d283c1ccb886511cb78ec398
clients-jdk8 Expired
2.29 MB
sha256:219b71f7b4c5e1f1d418d32b9c100bf4ddc093ee96be19781bb4563a6dd25d56
controller-jdk11 Expired
2.11 MB
sha256:6d550788fa33863fab04f53fd68c50ba3c6ac7e43ba1ccb79452b8859ef4f8de
controller-jdk17 Expired
2.09 MB
sha256:0a6c0756481db45123c15d34184effe96530d604777a5ce08c3dedae66d58a90
controller-jdk8 Expired
2.1 MB
sha256:cc74a56b79329a324003c89a5fcedaa786089b9168ae7c5a9a306e03f7af63ce
integrations-jdk11 Expired
612 KB
sha256:e1c933d61237592835a2b10457fac2faef633161882ddabe54b1f0aac011edc9
integrations-jdk17 Expired
617 KB
sha256:cdf8e4e60b17e0eb07a516c0e380b4af70e4d51661b350c0dc5da78aa13699f8
integrations-jdk8 Expired
598 KB
sha256:3c0de0cec56d2311d89df2c22084d17afd5a635705fb81667728c8f63623f388
internal-jdk11 Expired
4.44 MB
sha256:8e80e8149bb60b5d19e213244373cd38382999196cf598db2d7cf1ed096fe9ae
internal-jdk17 Expired
4.46 MB
sha256:e258da429025b835f9eb81a241012590aef0c48549528eaffa576165918f7b06
internal-jdk8 Expired
4.43 MB
sha256:32b05adf6b483cbd043463f58ae11aa71b450fe440d3b207963aa3e9d5a2174a
router-jdk11 Expired
775 KB
sha256:b3cd683d7935ec15ab473d0c3d77d89f422c91de89e8a79d7ffc6d582f1e4907
router-jdk17 Expired
778 KB
sha256:49d367f8aa9a4092e35427ff96f474e7ff7cdf9090f5cea93f337bbd9215034f
router-jdk8 Expired
769 KB
sha256:e009bdc4806f7caa258fedd80be495f0750b089252e08f7cbfebf6a7a9ade47b
server-jdk11 Expired
11.5 MB
sha256:82c7d1b1c80662612d53ba34ef787423ca8902d305d77ff45fe59d43ed933b23
server-jdk17 Expired
11 MB
sha256:88be27e18099e58718a3ad974d55cc427a5060bd00af9e155f8a4946c7fa04d4
server-jdk8 Expired
11.4 MB
sha256:b50b6b1695bd08d1dcca081a9162978399e5be417630c5fa1b0be6605fcfee6c