[test] Remove obsolete EOP epoch rewind test #476
pthirun
Matrix: Clients / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Controller / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Integrations / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Internal / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Router / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Server / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: StaticAnalysis
ValidateGradleWrapper
13s
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsFailureAlert
3s
Annotations
56 errors and 1 warning
|
StaticAnalysis (17)
Process completed with exit code 1.
|
|
com.linkedin.venice.endToEnd.DaVinciClientDiskFullTest ► testDaVinciDiskFullFailure[0](false, false):
internal/venice-test-common/src/integrationTest/java/com/linkedin/venice/endToEnd/DaVinciClientDiskFullTest.java#L310
Failed test found in:
IntegrationTests_22-artifacts/internal/venice-test-common/build/test-results/integrationTests_22/TEST-com.linkedin.venice.endToEnd.DaVinciClientDiskFullTest.xml
internal/venice-test-common/build/test-results/integrationTests_22/TEST-com.linkedin.venice.endToEnd.DaVinciClientDiskFullTest.xml
Error:
java.lang.AssertionError: Expected VeniceException to be thrown, but nothing was thrown
|
|
LeakedPushStatusCleanUpServiceTest.testLeakedZKNodeShouldBeDeleted:
services/venice-controller/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/pushmonitor/LeakedPushStatusCleanUpServiceTest.java#L95
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses(
"test_store_v2"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpServiceTest.testLeakedZKNodeShouldBeDeleted(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpServiceTest.java:95)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths(
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129)
offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime(
"test_store_v2"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152)
offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses(
"test_store_v1"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183)
offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths(
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129)
offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime(
"test_store_v2"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152)
offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths(
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129)
offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime(
"test_store_v2"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152)
offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses(
"test_store_v1"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183)
offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths(
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129)
offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime(
"test_store_v2"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152)
offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses(
"test_store_v1"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183)
offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths(
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129)
offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime(
"test_store_v2"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152)
offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses(
"test_store_v1"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183)
offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths(
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129)
offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime(
"test_store_v2"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152)
offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses(
"test_store_v1"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183)
offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths(
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushSta
|
|
LeakedPushStatusCleanUpServiceTest.testLeakedZKNodeShouldBeDeleted:
services/venice-controller/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/pushmonitor/LeakedPushStatusCleanUpServiceTest.java#L95
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses(
"test_store_v2"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpServiceTest.testLeakedZKNodeShouldBeDeleted(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpServiceTest.java:95)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths(
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129)
offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime(
"test_store_v2"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152)
offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses(
"test_store_v1"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183)
offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths(
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129)
offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime(
"test_store_v2"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152)
offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths(
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129)
offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime(
"test_store_v2"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152)
offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses(
"test_store_v1"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183)
offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths(
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129)
offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime(
"test_store_v2"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152)
offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses(
"test_store_v1"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183)
offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths(
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129)
offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime(
"test_store_v2"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152)
offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses(
"test_store_v1"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183)
offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths(
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129)
offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime(
"test_store_v2"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152)
offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses(
"test_store_v1"
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183)
offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths(
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushSta
|
|
RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.testSetRMDBlockCacheReportsLiveUsageValues:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/stats/RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.java#L49
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [1024.0] but found [0.0]
|
|
RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.testSetRMDBlockCacheRegistersGauges:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/stats/RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.java#L24
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [1024.0] but found [0.0]
|
|
KafkaStoreIngestionServiceWithStoreAwarePartitionWiseTest.testAAWCThreadPoolStatsAreRegistered:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/KafkaStoreIngestionServiceWithStoreAwarePartitionWiseTest.java#L1
java.lang.AssertionError: AA/WC parallel processing thread pool should have 4 threads expected [4] but found [0]
|
|
StoreBackendTest.testSubscribeCurrentVersion:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/StoreBackendTest.java#L153
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [NaN] but found [0.0]
|
|
RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.testSetRMDBlockCacheReportsLiveUsageValues:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/stats/RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.java#L49
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [1024.0] but found [0.0]
|
|
RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.testSetRMDBlockCacheRegistersGauges:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/stats/RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.java#L24
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [1024.0] but found [0.0]
|
|
KafkaStoreIngestionServiceWithStoreAwarePartitionWiseTest.testAAWCThreadPoolStatsAreRegistered:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/KafkaStoreIngestionServiceWithStoreAwarePartitionWiseTest.java#L1
java.lang.AssertionError: AA/WC parallel processing thread pool should have 4 threads expected [4] but found [0]
|
|
StoreBackendTest.testSubscribeCurrentVersion:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/StoreBackendTest.java#L153
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [NaN] but found [0.0]
|
|
TestProtocolVersionAutoDetectionService.testProtocolVersionDetectionWithNoUpdate:
services/venice-controller/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/controller/TestProtocolVersionAutoDetectionService.java#L209
java.lang.AssertionError: Tehuti latency should be > 0 expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
TestProtocolVersionAutoDetectionService.testProtocolVersionDetectionWithNoUpdate:
services/venice-controller/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/controller/TestProtocolVersionAutoDetectionService.java#L209
java.lang.AssertionError: Tehuti latency should be > 0 expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
com.linkedin.venice.controller.TestTopicRequestOnHybridDelete ► serverRestartOnHybridStoreKeepsVersionOnline:
internal/venice-test-common/src/main/java/com/linkedin/venice/utils/TestUtils.java#L774
Failed test found in:
IntegrationTests_18-artifacts/internal/venice-test-common/build/test-results/integrationTests_18/TEST-com.linkedin.venice.controller.TestTopicRequestOnHybridDelete.xml
internal/venice-test-common/build/test-results/integrationTests_18/TEST-com.linkedin.venice.controller.TestTopicRequestOnHybridDelete.xml
Error:
java.lang.AssertionError: Controller error: An error occurred during controller request. controller = http://localhost:45695, route = /check_resource_cleanup_for_store_creation, params = [cluster_name=venice-cluster_3764cc1705_45afdfb1, hostname=localhost, store_name=hybrid-store_3c1cebb15d_14279914], timeout = 600000. Exception type: class com.linkedin.venice.exceptions.VeniceHttpException. Detailed message: Http Status 412 - Helix Resource: hybrid-store_3c1cebb15d_14279914_v1 still exists for store: hybrid-store_3c1cebb15d_14279914, please make sure all helix resources are removed. expected [false] but found [true]
|
|
TopicMetadataFetcherTest.testGetEarliestPositionCachedNonBlockingScenarios:
internal/venice-common/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/pubsub/manager/TopicMetadataFetcherTest.java#L709
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [1] but found [0]
|
|
InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.testInstanceMeasurement:
internal/venice-common/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/memory/InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.java#L49
java.lang.AssertionError: Class KafkaKey has a memoryAllocatedPerInstance (37.37856) which is too far from the predictedUsage (40); delta: 0.066; maxAllowedDelta: 0.027. No more attempts left.
|
|
TopicMetadataFetcherTest.testGetEarliestPositionCachedNonBlockingScenarios:
internal/venice-common/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/pubsub/manager/TopicMetadataFetcherTest.java#L709
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [1] but found [0]
|
|
InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.testInstanceMeasurement:
internal/venice-common/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/memory/InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.java#L49
java.lang.AssertionError: Class KafkaKey has a memoryAllocatedPerInstance (37.37856) which is too far from the predictedUsage (40); delta: 0.066; maxAllowedDelta: 0.027. No more attempts left.
|
|
StatTrackingStoreClientTest.testMultiGet:
clients/venice-thin-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/client/store/StatTrackingStoreClientTest.java#L277
java.lang.AssertionError: Success Key Ratio should be positive expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.testThrottlingDoesNotBlockBelowQuota:
clients/venice-push-job/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/hadoop/task/datawriter/AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.java#L167
java.lang.AssertionError: Messages should not be throttled when below quota, elapsed: 293ms expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
StatTrackingStoreClientTest.testMultiGet:
clients/venice-thin-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/client/store/StatTrackingStoreClientTest.java#L277
java.lang.AssertionError: Success Key Ratio should be positive expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.testThrottlingDoesNotBlockBelowQuota:
clients/venice-push-job/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/hadoop/task/datawriter/AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.java#L167
java.lang.AssertionError: Messages should not be throttled when below quota, elapsed: 293ms expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
com.linkedin.venice.endToEnd.TestLeaderReplicaFailover ► testLeaderReplicaFailoverFutureVersion:
internal/venice-test-common/src/integrationTest/java/com/linkedin/venice/endToEnd/TestLeaderReplicaFailover.java#L204
Failed test found in:
IntegrationTests_20-artifacts/internal/venice-test-common/build/test-results/integrationTests_20/TEST-com.linkedin.venice.endToEnd.TestLeaderReplicaFailover.xml
internal/venice-test-common/build/test-results/integrationTests_20/TEST-com.linkedin.venice.endToEnd.TestLeaderReplicaFailover.xml
Error:
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.testSetRMDBlockCacheReportsLiveUsageValues:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/stats/RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.java#L49
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [1024.0] but found [0.0]
|
|
RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.testSetRMDBlockCacheRegistersGauges:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/stats/RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.java#L24
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [1024.0] but found [0.0]
|
|
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testDataValidationCheckPointing[0](SORTED, AA_ON):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
logNotifier.completed(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
<Capturing argument>,
"STANDBY"
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.notifier.LogNotifier.completed(LogNotifier.java:27)
However, there were exactly 981 interactions with this mock:
logNotifier.started(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportStarted$1(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:117)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{2}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{3}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{4}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{5}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{6}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{7}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{8}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{9}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{10}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{11}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{12}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{13}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{14}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{15}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{16}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$re
|
|
KafkaStoreIngestionServiceWithStoreAwarePartitionWiseTest.testAAWCThreadPoolStatsAreRegistered:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/KafkaStoreIngestionServiceWithStoreAwarePartitionWiseTest.java#L1
java.lang.AssertionError: AA/WC parallel processing thread pool should have 4 threads expected [4] but found [0]
|
|
StoreBackendTest.testSubscribeCurrentVersion:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/StoreBackendTest.java#L153
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [NaN] but found [0.0]
|
|
RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.testSetRMDBlockCacheReportsLiveUsageValues:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/stats/RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.java#L49
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [1024.0] but found [0.0]
|
|
RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.testSetRMDBlockCacheRegistersGauges:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/stats/RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.java#L24
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [1024.0] but found [0.0]
|
|
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testDataValidationCheckPointing[0](SORTED, AA_ON):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
logNotifier.completed(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
<Capturing argument>,
"STANDBY"
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.notifier.LogNotifier.completed(LogNotifier.java:27)
However, there were exactly 981 interactions with this mock:
logNotifier.started(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportStarted$1(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:117)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{2}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{3}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{4}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{5}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{6}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{7}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{8}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{9}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{10}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{11}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{12}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{13}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{14}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{15}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214)
logNotifier.progress(
"TestTopic_3b2a72a3b0_6b4c02fe_v1",
1,
InMemoryPubSubPosition{16}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$re
|
|
KafkaStoreIngestionServiceWithStoreAwarePartitionWiseTest.testAAWCThreadPoolStatsAreRegistered:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/KafkaStoreIngestionServiceWithStoreAwarePartitionWiseTest.java#L1
java.lang.AssertionError: AA/WC parallel processing thread pool should have 4 threads expected [4] but found [0]
|
|
StoreBackendTest.testSubscribeCurrentVersion:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/StoreBackendTest.java#L153
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [NaN] but found [0.0]
|
|
StatTrackingStoreClientTest.testMultiGet:
clients/venice-thin-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/client/store/StatTrackingStoreClientTest.java#L277
java.lang.AssertionError: Success Key Ratio should be positive expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.testThrottlingDoesNotBlockBelowQuota:
clients/venice-push-job/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/hadoop/task/datawriter/AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.java#L167
java.lang.AssertionError: Messages should not be throttled when below quota, elapsed: 569ms expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
StatTrackingStoreClientTest.testMultiGet:
clients/venice-thin-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/client/store/StatTrackingStoreClientTest.java#L277
java.lang.AssertionError: Success Key Ratio should be positive expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.testThrottlingDoesNotBlockBelowQuota:
clients/venice-push-job/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/hadoop/task/datawriter/AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.java#L167
java.lang.AssertionError: Messages should not be throttled when below quota, elapsed: 569ms expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:558)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2950)
|
|
KafkaStoreIngestionServiceWithStoreAwarePartitionWiseTest.testAAWCThreadPoolStatsAreRegistered:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/KafkaStoreIngestionServiceWithStoreAwarePartitionWiseTest.java#L1
java.lang.AssertionError: AA/WC parallel processing thread pool should have 4 threads expected [4] but found [0]
|
|
StoreBackendTest.testSubscribeCurrentVersion:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/StoreBackendTest.java#L172
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
StoreBackendTest.testSubscribeCurrentVersion:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/StoreBackendTest.java#L153
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [NaN] but found [0.0]
|
|
RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.testSetRMDBlockCacheReportsLiveUsageValues:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/stats/RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.java#L49
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [1024.0] but found [0.0]
|
|
RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.testSetRMDBlockCacheRegistersGauges:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/stats/RocksDBMemoryStatsTest.java#L24
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [1024.0] but found [0.0]
|
|
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:558)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2950)
|
|
KafkaStoreIngestionServiceWithStoreAwarePartitionWiseTest.testAAWCThreadPoolStatsAreRegistered:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/KafkaStoreIngestionServiceWithStoreAwarePartitionWiseTest.java#L1
java.lang.AssertionError: AA/WC parallel processing thread pool should have 4 threads expected [4] but found [0]
|
|
StoreBackendTest.testSubscribeCurrentVersion:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/StoreBackendTest.java#L172
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
StoreBackendTest.testSubscribeCurrentVersion:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/StoreBackendTest.java#L153
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [NaN] but found [0.0]
|
|
StatTrackingStoreClientTest.testMultiGet:
clients/venice-thin-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/client/store/StatTrackingStoreClientTest.java#L277
java.lang.AssertionError: Success Key Ratio should be positive expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.testThrottlingDoesNotBlockBelowQuota:
clients/venice-push-job/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/hadoop/task/datawriter/AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.java#L167
java.lang.AssertionError: Messages should not be throttled when below quota, elapsed: 327ms expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
StatTrackingStoreClientTest.testMultiGet:
clients/venice-thin-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/client/store/StatTrackingStoreClientTest.java#L277
java.lang.AssertionError: Success Key Ratio should be positive expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.testThrottlingDoesNotBlockBelowQuota:
clients/venice-push-job/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/hadoop/task/datawriter/AbstractPartitionWriterThrottlingTest.java#L167
java.lang.AssertionError: Messages should not be throttled when below quota, elapsed: 327ms expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsFailureAlert
Process completed with exit code 1.
|
|
com.linkedin.venice.endToEnd.DataRecoveryTest ► setUp:
internal/venice-test-common/src/main/java/com/linkedin/venice/utils/TestUtils.java#L527
Failed test found in:
IntegrationTests_21-artifacts/internal/venice-test-common/build/test-results/integrationTests_21/TEST-com.linkedin.venice.endToEnd.DataRecoveryTest.xml
internal/venice-test-common/build/test-results/integrationTests_21/TEST-com.linkedin.venice.endToEnd.DataRecoveryTest.xml
Error:
java.lang.AssertionError: Push is yet to complete: JobStatusQueryResponse(
|
|
com.linkedin.venice.endToEnd.TestBatchForRocksDB ► testZstdCompressingAvroRecordCanFailWhenNoFallbackAvailable:
internal/venice-test-common/src/integrationTest/java/com/linkedin/venice/endToEnd/TestBatch.java#L293
Failed test found in:
IntegrationTests_12-artifacts/internal/venice-test-common/build/test-results/integrationTests_12/TEST-com.linkedin.venice.endToEnd.TestBatchForRocksDB.xml
internal/venice-test-common/build/test-results/integrationTests_12/TEST-com.linkedin.venice.endToEnd.TestBatchForRocksDB.xml
Error:
java.lang.AssertionError: Unexpected exception message
|
|
com.linkedin.venice.server.VeniceServerTest ► testVeniceServerWithD2[1](true):
internal/venice-test-common/src/integrationTest/java/com/linkedin/venice/server/VeniceServerTest.java#L409
Failed test found in:
IntegrationTests_12-artifacts/internal/venice-test-common/build/test-results/integrationTests_12/TEST-com.linkedin.venice.server.VeniceServerTest.xml
internal/venice-test-common/build/test-results/integrationTests_12/TEST-com.linkedin.venice.server.VeniceServerTest.xml
Error:
java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: RestException{_response=RestResponse[headers={content-length=134, Content-Type=text/plain, X-VENICE-COMPRESSION-STRATEGY=0, X-VENICE-RCU=1, X-VENICE-SCHEMA-ID=-1},cookies=[],status=403,entityLength=134]}
|
|
UWF_UNWRITTEN_PUBLIC_OR_PROTECTED_FIELD:
clients/venice-push-job/src/main/java/com/linkedin/venice/hadoop/VenicePushJob.java#L1990
Unwritten public or protected field: com.linkedin.venice.hadoop.PushJobSetting.validateRemoteReplayPolicy
|
Artifacts
Produced during runtime
| Name | Size | Digest | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
StaticAnalysis
Expired
|
956 KB |
sha256:5380361abea89315dcd2d846812c10fd3a91a805e9d3692b708d6ebea228c6c7
|
|
|
clients-jdk11
Expired
|
3.22 MB |
sha256:45174aca6bf076c2a6c9a510c98008c25f233beb64bb421fe6b6d0c2c7716134
|
|
|
clients-jdk17
Expired
|
3.22 MB |
sha256:a6b025bb1aa8866e21d525c31f3754d8ef928e4eac28dfd442eac2272a72a4d7
|
|
|
clients-jdk8
Expired
|
3.19 MB |
sha256:477e211ce97387951004f49336cd81edc281dba208c8d286d518f8b3f4861ba7
|
|
|
controller-jdk11
Expired
|
2.14 MB |
sha256:eb10b682808ad0238e109f6d158eabb48159cee85876e801665aebab11199dc7
|
|
|
controller-jdk17
Expired
|
2.1 MB |
sha256:0db1b3c5b36c7ec6e64a56871bb0b5f09bd237c87111d1486c4e8f6181b8b281
|
|
|
controller-jdk8
Expired
|
2.12 MB |
sha256:9ac7151bd683466d999052790427bb9521f8985786729e9c910fd2339f924e9b
|
|
|
integrations-jdk11
Expired
|
614 KB |
sha256:f1c1eeb89d142c23f83ad506a4def25619bb3f19d85c1152439621f35707cc53
|
|
|
integrations-jdk17
Expired
|
617 KB |
sha256:6f48fad01f653b848088f9b416d1ae6e19a7131694aab454739ca98ef20df3d1
|
|
|
integrations-jdk8
Expired
|
606 KB |
sha256:0ce859abef3ae5ed5ab01537d97abf9df2f13475d276f8189b44eaa8a45d2c95
|
|
|
internal-jdk11
Expired
|
4.45 MB |
sha256:70837c6dc19801ba408d70c5c281d75166cacfcfe56644f50ddd09030cd6bf2f
|
|
|
internal-jdk17
Expired
|
4.46 MB |
sha256:5cead6c5a4b38dae0e0ce4ecd0eeac4ac0f3431b6c32c16c6b72465339a26109
|
|
|
internal-jdk8
Expired
|
4.43 MB |
sha256:9f42ee4965ffa33a95a1735daeebbf4453035f72a1e44d1f89fcf89459bfc1d0
|
|
|
router-jdk11
Expired
|
774 KB |
sha256:a2d3d30116e925a137bbf211f79d39094aa9d28e719ba90f46213cd52b9ca1c8
|
|
|
router-jdk17
Expired
|
774 KB |
sha256:b57308370977696d6dad846aa82d4688965a73a864077ddcfbe433fcf5d8942e
|
|
|
router-jdk8
Expired
|
766 KB |
sha256:dc386a7d0e5bf6beaf1c536691ec107091991ce07b7bea9ae17ebb8500488dc1
|
|
|
server-jdk11
Expired
|
11.3 MB |
sha256:8bfdda21b78a8f4a173a3ad644f98d3a4a8ff5c3df3c8136f1035531546816e3
|
|
|
server-jdk17
Expired
|
11.1 MB |
sha256:111decf02432b44aac0334cf0811dbf7f9ccc548f0dc89f9dd83a54650b46fe1
|
|
|
server-jdk8
Expired
|
11.3 MB |
sha256:b7d0e3ca94fdd3083f635349d65ebd37a78660d666f2079eaa123e0a3e66a8b6
|
|