You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/src/index.md
+7-5Lines changed: 7 additions & 5 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -9,8 +9,7 @@ The goal is to allow the user to easily combine and modify a set of primitive mo
9
9
to construct complicated source structures. The benefit of this approach is that it is straightforward to construct different source models out of these primitives. Namely, an end-user does
10
10
not have to create a separate source "model" every time they
11
11
change the model specification. Additionally, most models currently implemented are differentiable with at Zygote and sometimes ForwardDiff[^2]. This allows for gradient accelerated optimization and sampling (e.g., HMC) to be used with little
12
-
effort by the end user.
13
-
To sample from the posterior, we provide a somewhat barebones interface since, most of the time, and we don't require the additional features offered by most PPLs. Additionally, the overhead introduced by PPLs tends to be rather large. In the future, we may revisit this as
12
+
effort by the end user. To sample from the posterior, we provide a somewhat barebones interface since, most of the time, and we don't require the additional features offered by most PPLs. Additionally, the overhead introduced by PPLs tends to be rather large. In the future, we may revisit this as
Our tutorial section currently has a large number of examples. The simplest example is fitting simple geometric models to the 2017 M87 data and is detailed in the [Geometric Modeling of EHT Data tutorial](@ref). We also include "non-parametric" modeling or imaging examples in [Imaging a Black Hole using only Closure Quantities](@ref), and [Stokes I Simultaneous Image and Instrument Modeling](@ref). There is also an introduction to hybrid geometric and image modeling in [Hybrid Imaging of a Black Hole](@ref), which combines physically motivated geometric modeling with the flexibility of image-based models. Finally, we
22
+
provide a tutorial on how to use `Comrade` to model polarized data including simultaneously solving for
23
+
the image and instrumental effects like gain ratios and leakage terms in [Polarized Image and Instrumental Modeling](@ref).
24
+
25
+
22
26
23
27
## Contributing
24
28
25
29
This repository has recently moved to [ColPrac](https://github.com/SciML/ColPrac). If you would like to contribute please feel free to open a issue or pull-request.
26
30
27
-
[^2]: As of 0.9 Comrade switched to using full covariance closures. As a result this requires a sparse cholesky solve in the likelihood evaluation which requires
28
-
a Dual number overload. As a result we recommend using Zygote which does work and
29
-
often is similarly performant (reverse 3-6x slower compared to the forward pass).
31
+
[^2]: As of 0.9 Comrade switched to using full covariance closures. As a result this requires a sparse cholesky solve in the likelihood evaluation which requires which isn't defined in ForwardDiff. As a result we recommend using Zygote which does work and often is similarly performant (reverse pass is 3-6x slower compared to the forward pass).
0 commit comments