Skip to content

Conversation

@parfeon
Copy link
Contributor

@parfeon parfeon commented Nov 4, 2025

fix(heartbeat): fix state query parameter

Send proper object for state with the heartbeat request.

refactor(here-now): remove limit value clamping

Don't cap limit and let the server perform value validation.

refactor(subscribe): replace legacy t with tt and tr

Replace legacy timetoken query parameter with subscribe v2 parameters.

Don't cap `limit` and let the server perform value validation.

refactor(subscribe): replace legacy `t` with `tt` and `tr`

Replace legacy timetoken query parameter with subscribe v2 parameters.

fix(heartbeat): fix `state` query parameter

Send proper object for `state` with the `heartbeat` request.
@parfeon parfeon self-assigned this Nov 4, 2025
@parfeon parfeon requested a review from jguz-pubnub as a code owner November 4, 2025 01:57
@parfeon parfeon added status: done This issue is considered resolved. priority: medium This PR should be reviewed after all high priority PRs. type: fix This PR contains fixes to existing features. type: refactor This PR contains refactored existing features. labels Nov 4, 2025
@pubnub-ops-terraform
Copy link

pubnub-ops-terraform commented Nov 4, 2025

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scanner Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

chore(CODEOWNERS): add new SDK maintainer

Add `@mohitpubnub` as Ruby SDK maintainer.
@parfeon parfeon requested a review from mohitpubnub November 4, 2025 02:04
else
[Pubnub::Constants::MAXIMUM_HERE_NOW_COUNT, @limit].min
end
@limit = Pubnub::Constants::MAXIMUM_HERE_NOW_COUNT if @limit.nil?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So are we going to allow value more than MAXIMUM_HERE_NOW_COUNT?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

n/m

limit higher than 1000 and negative offset are handled on server side.

I read this now

@parfeon
Copy link
Contributor Author

parfeon commented Nov 4, 2025

@pubnub-release-bot release

@parfeon parfeon merged commit b2540e2 into master Nov 4, 2025
10 checks passed
@parfeon parfeon deleted the refactor/here-now-limit-no-clamp branch November 4, 2025 10:24
@pubnub-release-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Release successfully completed 🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

priority: medium This PR should be reviewed after all high priority PRs. status: done This issue is considered resolved. type: fix This PR contains fixes to existing features. type: refactor This PR contains refactored existing features.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants