my First PreSubmission Inquiry

[isabelizimm]

Version submitted:
Target repository:
Author handle:
Submitting Author: Name (@isabelizimm)
Package Name: mypackage
One-Line Description of Package: doing very cool things
Repository Link (if existing):
Editor-in-Chief: @isabelizimm

---

Code of Conduct & Commitment to Maintain Package

• I agree to abide by pyOpenSci's Code of Conduct during the review process and in maintaining my package after should it be accepted.
• I have read and will commit to package maintenance after the review as per the pyOpenSci Policies Guidelines.

Description

• Include a brief paragraph describing what your package does:

Community Partnerships

We partner with communities to support peer review with an additional layer of
checks that satisfy community requirements. If your package fits into an
existing community please check below:

• Pangeo
  • My package adheres to the Pangeo standards listed in the pyOpenSci peer review guidebook

Scope

• Please indicate which category or categories this package falls under:

Scope

• Please indicate which category or categories.
  Check out our package scope page to learn more about our
  scope. (If you are unsure of which category you fit, we suggest you make a pre-submission inquiry):

  • Data retrieval
  • Data extraction
  • Data processing/munging
  • Data deposition
  • Data validation and testing
  • Data visualization
  • Workflow automation
  • Citation management and bibliometrics
  • Scientific software wrappers
  • Database interoperability

Domain Specific & Community Partnerships

- [ ] Geospatial
- [ ] Education
- [ ] Pangeo
- [ ] Unsure/Other (explain below)

• Explain how and why the package falls under these categories (briefly, 1-2 sentences). Please note any areas you are unsure of:

• Who is the target audience and what are the scientific applications of this package?

• Are there other Python packages that accomplish similar things? If so, how does yours differ?

• Any other questions or issues we should be aware of:

P.S. Have feedback/comments about our review process? Leave a comment here

[pyosbot]

Hey @isabelizimm 👋 welcome to pyOpenSci’s scientific Python peer review process!

We’ve seen your message. Someone from our editorial team will get back to you within the next week about this submission.
In the meantime, feel free to check out our packaging guide or feel free to ask questions on our Discourse forum.

[pyosbot]

The submission template is missing the following values: version-submitted, target-repository, author-handle

[isabelizimm]

@pyosbot set @isabelizimm as eic

[pyosbot]

Done! eic is now @isabelizimm

[isabelizimm]

@pyosbot add @isabelizimm as editor

[pyosbot]

Assigned! @isabelizimm is now the editor

[isabelizimm]

^^^ i think it should not assign as an editor for pre-submissions?

[isabelizimm]

@pyosbot remove editor

[pyosbot]

Editor removed!

[isabelizimm]

^^ also an oops, no editors were ever assigned

[isabelizimm]

@pyosbot add @isabelizimm as eic

[pyosbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@pyosbot help

[isabelizimm]

okay, i dont think im going to remember the difference for add/set. maybe have both?