Replies: 2 comments
-
|
There is no plan to support it yet, because the implementation of the quic protocol is very complicated. At present, openssl is already developing the support of the quic protocol. This feature will be added when openssl supports it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Fair enough, I really appreciate what you already did... I use SmartDNS
within ddwrt and I like it very much...
…On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 4:43 AM Nick Peng ***@***.***> wrote:
There is no plan to support it yet, because the implementation of the quic
protocol is very complicated. At present, openssl is already developing the
support of the quic protocol. This feature will be added when openssl
supports it.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#983 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADBJPMBAAN6TFBYZNBUZNB3VTYULPANCNFSM53KG3XPQ>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Can you reconsider implementing DoQ? Seems it became a standard
I know there is no big difference between DoT, DoH and DoQ for everyday smartdns user but I think there should be choice... Every major DNS provider I tested supports DoQ... CloduFlare, NextDNS, AdGuard... i read that there were some problems with go-lang libraries for DoQ but will be solved soon...
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions