Sequences : Make the annotation instructions more explicit

[fe51]

Pitch

At sequences level work, the aim is to

Review the sequence chronologically to identify any smoke or fire that the model may have missed.

This is well explained in the modal (when clicking on info button).

However, the action wording "Missed smoke" is not very clear, for a new user (who could very well have missed an introduction step or missed to click).

See screen below

Suggestion

Updates "Missed smoke ?" to a more explicit question.
It could be something like :

• "Are there any other smoke/fire that the model might have missed? "
• “Any(other) smoke/fire the model missed?”
• “Did the model miss any (other) smoke or fire?”
• “Any (other) undetected smoke or fire?”
• "Missing smoke/fire elsewhere in the images" ?

Happy to discuss it and receive relevant suggestions :)

---