Usage within an Nx/Rush monorepo #11230
Replies: 2 comments 7 replies
-
|
@jagged3dge I haven't used Nx, but I do use |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@jagged3dge - I've looked into this myself and had concluded Nx's opinionation about how to build projects/apps/packages is a hard fit for frameworks like Quasar. I ended up with Rush as a monorepo manager (and also pnpm as a package manager). I'm still experimenting, but I think I can safely say Rush's use of the project's own build process is simpler than Nx's "executors". I may be totally wrong in my assessment too, so take it with a grain of salt, but Rush just seems a lot more pragmatic. Scott |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
My team is considering using Nx to hold all our code for a project. This would contain the frontend apps (SPA, PWA, Electron/Tauri) as well as the backend services (API, Data abstraction layer, message queue, etc).
I'm weighing on using Quasar for the frontend apps. From previous experience with Quasar SPA & PWAs, I'm pretty confident Quasar is a very good candidate for this. However, I'm not sure how it stands in regards to co-existing with other packages in a monorepo.
Is this possible? From the looks of things, quasar generates its own project structure.
Is it possible to plug this in within a monorepo containing custom libs?
Looking for guidance from anybody with previous experience with quasar within nx.
Any pointers will be equally appreciated :)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions