q-select built-in simple filter
#11773
Unanswered
robsontenorio
asked this question in
Ideas / Proposals
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
That would only save a few letters that are the name of the function. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Calling such a function would be rather cumbersome. It is necessary to pass 1) unfiltered options (which will have to be returned from setup) 2) options, and 3) option-label. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Currently any kind of filter for q-select must be implemented manually.
For the simple cases (client side only) why not provide the basic filter out of box? This would cut a lot of boilerplate.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions