Another rchk issue to look into

[DavisVaughan]

Function cpp11::writable::r_vector<SEXPREC*>::r_vector(std::initializer_list<cpp11::named_arg>)::{lambda()#1}::operator()() const
  [UP] unprotected variable names while calling allocating function Rf_mkCharCE cpp11/include/cpp11/list.hpp:91

Function cpp11::writable::r_vector<cpp11::r_bool>::r_vector(std::initializer_list<cpp11::named_arg>)::{lambda()#1}::operator()() const
  [UP] unprotected variable names while calling allocating function Rf_mkCharCE cpp11/include/cpp11/r_vector.hpp:890

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kalibera/cran-checks/master/rchk/results/adfExplorer.out
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kalibera/cran-checks/master/rchk/results/cpp11bigwig.out

I believe it is saying we have an unprotected SEXP called names at the point that we call Rf_mkCharCE(). This is surely a false alarm, because Rf_setAttrib() protects names by installed it as an attribute on data_, but I guess we can try to work around it.

template <>
inline r_vector<SEXP>::r_vector(std::initializer_list<named_arg> il)
    : cpp11::r_vector<SEXP>(safe[Rf_allocVector](VECSXP, il.size())),
      capacity_(il.size()) {
  unwind_protect([&] {
    SEXP names = Rf_allocVector(STRSXP, capacity_);
    Rf_setAttrib(data_, R_NamesSymbol, names);

    auto it = il.begin();

    for (R_xlen_t i = 0; i < capacity_; ++i, ++it) {
      SEXP elt = it->value();
      set_elt(data_, i, elt);

      SEXP name = Rf_mkCharCE(it->name(), CE_UTF8);
      SET_STRING_ELT(names, i, name);
    }
  });
}

[pachadotdev]

@DavisVaughan how about #457 ?