You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: NEWS.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ factor("a") %>%
22
22
The exception to this rule are the expectations that evaluate (i.e.
23
23
for messages, warnings, errors, output etc), which invisibly return `NULL`. These functions are now more consistent: using `NA` will cause a failure if there is a errors/warnings/mesages/output (i.e. they're not missing), and will `NULL` fail if there aren't any errors/warnings/mesages/output. This previously didn't work for `expect_output()` (#323), and the error messages were confusing with `expect_error(..., NA)` (#342, @nealrichardson + @krlmlr, #317).
24
24
25
-
Another change is that `expect_output()` now requires you to explicit print the output if you want to test a print method: `expect_output("a", "a")` will fail, `expect_output(print("a"), "a")` will succeed.
25
+
Another change is that `expect_output()` now requires you to explicitly print the output if you want to test a print method: `expect_output("a", "a")` will fail, `expect_output(print("a"), "a")` will succeed.
0 commit comments