-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 343
expect_not_contains() #1851
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
expectation 🙀featurea feature request or enhancementa feature request or enhancementtidy-dev-day 🤓Tidyverse Developer Day rstd.io/tidy-dev-dayTidyverse Developer Day rstd.io/tidy-dev-day
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
expectation 🙀featurea feature request or enhancementa feature request or enhancementtidy-dev-day 🤓Tidyverse Developer Day rstd.io/tidy-dev-dayTidyverse Developer Day rstd.io/tidy-dev-day
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
It would be helpful to have a collection of negated checkers, or utilities to help negate existing checks. For example, we have
expect_contains, but not a straightforward way to check when values should no be in the haystack.I could write this as the following, but would not receive any assistance in reporting the unexpected values:
Getting feedback is cumbersome: