build: separate Qt5 and Qt6 build configurations by split debian/control #20
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| name: opencode-review | |
| on: | |
| # issue_comment covers both issues and PR comments | |
| issue_comment: | |
| types: [created] | |
| pull_request_review_comment: | |
| types: [created] | |
| jobs: | |
| review: | |
| # Only trigger in PRs (not issues), and require @opencode or /opencode trigger | |
| if: | | |
| ( | |
| github.event_name == 'issue_comment' && | |
| github.event.issue.pull_request && | |
| ( | |
| contains(github.event.comment.body, '@opencode') || | |
| contains(github.event.comment.body, '/opencode') | |
| ) | |
| ) || | |
| ( | |
| github.event_name == 'pull_request_review_comment' && | |
| ( | |
| contains(github.event.comment.body, '@opencode') || | |
| contains(github.event.comment.body, '/opencode') | |
| ) | |
| ) | |
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | |
| permissions: | |
| contents: read # Change to 'write' to allow OpenCode to push commits | |
| pull-requests: write # Required to post comments (kept as write for responses) | |
| issues: read # Change to 'write' if you enable issue workflows later | |
| actions: read # Required to read CI results on PRs | |
| id-token: write # Required for OIDC token generation (OpenCode GitHub App) | |
| steps: | |
| - uses: actions/checkout@v6 | |
| with: | |
| persist-credentials: false | |
| - uses: anomalyco/opencode/github@latest | |
| env: | |
| # ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }} | |
| ZHIPU_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ZHIPU_API_KEY }} | |
| ZHIPU_BASE_URL: ${{ secrets.ZHIPU_BASE_URL }} | |
| # with: | |
| # # model: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-20250514 | |
| # model: zai-coding-plan/glm-4.7 | |
| # use_github_token: true | |
| # prompt: | | |
| # Review this pull request: | |
| # - Check for code quality issues | |
| # - Look for potential bugs | |
| # - Suggest improvements | |
| with: | |
| model: ${{ secrets.OPENCODE_PR_REVIEW_MODEL }} | |
| share: false | |
| agent: plan | |
| prompt: | | |
| 你是一位严格的代码安全审计员。请对代码变更进行审查。 | |
| 【审查原则 - 去噪模式】： | |
| - **只报告高风险问题**：例如导致崩溃、安全漏洞、数据丢失、构建失败、严重的逻辑错误。 | |
| - **忽略以下问题**：代码风格、变量命名、微小的性能优化、非确定性的潜在问题。 | |
| - 如果不确定，不要报告。 | |
| - 如果没有高风险问题，请回复："No critical risks found." | |
| 【输出格式要求】： | |
| 第一部分：具体风险建议（供人阅读） | |
| 针对每一个高风险问题，请按以下格式输出： | |
| suggestion (bug_risk): [一句话概括核心问题] | |
| [简短解释原因] | |
| Suggested implementation: | |
| ```[语言] | |
| [修复代码片段] | |
| ``` | |
| 第二部分：AI 修复指令汇总（供 AI Agent 使用） | |
| 在列出所有具体建议后，请严格遵循以下格式生成 "Prompt for AI Agents" 部分： | |
| Prompt for AI Agents: | |
| ```markdown | |
| Please address the comments from this code review: | |
| ## Overall Comments | |
| [在此处总结宏观问题（例如元数据重复、依赖不一致等），若无则写 "No overall comments."] | |
| ## Individual Comments | |
| ### Comment [序号] | |
| <location> `[文件路径]:[起始行]-[结束行]` </location> | |
| <code_context> | |
| [粘贴该位置有问题的原始代码上下文] | |
| </code_context> | |
| <issue_to_address> | |
| **suggestion (bug_risk):** [问题标题] | |
| [详细原因说明] | |
| Suggested implementation: | |
| ``` | |
| [再次粘贴修复后的代码] | |
| ``` | |
| </issue_to_address> | |
| ``` | |
| 开始审查： |