Skip to content

Commit 7fc703c

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #4 from recordweb/Jenziner-patch-1
Fix: correct metadata to recordweb (Editorial correction, no content change)
2 parents d92bc24 + a13e8b5 commit 7fc703c

1 file changed

Lines changed: 2 additions & 3 deletions

File tree

index.bs

Lines changed: 2 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -3,14 +3,13 @@ Title: RecordWeb Concept (RWC)
33
Shortname: rwc
44
Level: 1
55
Status: CG-DRAFT
6-
Group: wicg
6+
Org: W3C
77
URL: https://recordweb.github.io/rwc/
88
Editor: Nik Jenzer, nik@triebwerkstatt.ch
99
Abstract:
1010
RecordWeb postulates a paradigm shift in institutional information management. Not a better filing principle, not a smarter dossier structure — but a different foundational decision about what information is: an autonomous, permanently identifiable, versioned, and cryptographically secured object called a Record. This concept paper lays out the conceptual foundations of RecordWeb, distinguishes it from related approaches, and describes the path from idea to specification. It is the conceptual counterpart to the RecordWeb Protocol ([[RWP]]).
1111
Repository: recordweb/rwc
1212
Markup Shorthands: markdown yes
13-
Boilerplate: omit copyright
1413
Version History: https://github.com/recordweb/rwc/commits/main/index.bs
1514
Previous Version: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20475343
1615
</pre>
@@ -119,7 +118,7 @@ The published baseline of this concept is available at [[ZENODO-RWC]] (Version 1
119118
Feedback is invited via [GitHub Issues](https://github.com/recordweb/rwc/issues).
120119

121120

122-
Abstract {#abstract}
121+
Summary {#summary}
123122
=====================
124123

125124
Public administrations have managed information for decades in systems built for filing, not for traceability. The result is well known: incomplete dossiers, lost version histories, system boundaries that fragment information, and an institutional memory that promises more than it delivers.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)