Documentation inaccuracies

[Panadero1]

When working with this library, I found a lot of documentation slight errors that most likely came from copy & paste. Should I list them all here, or just fix them all and have them be listed in the pull request for this issue?

It's things like saying "mat4" in the description of a mat2 function or describing the operation of a function wrong

Thanks

[Panadero1]

some have been fixed in source already, but the readthedocs page is outdated

[recp]

Hi @Panadero1,

May be copy-paste errors

just fix them all and have them be listed in the pull request for this issue?

That would be awesome :)

[metaleap]

Another doc gotcha is that docs mention umat twice, as some sort of "unaligned support", but no umat stuff (funcs or types) exists in the actual sources.

[recp]

@metaleap thanks for the catch,

I'll try to fix it asap, @Panadero1 still waiting :/ ?