|
| 1 | +# MLflow Tracing for Claude Code Agent Runtimes on RHOAI |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +We deployed Claude Code as a containerized agent on Red Hat OpenShift AI and wired it up to the MLflow instance running on the same cluster. To validate the full tracing stack, we ran the same prompt — **"build me a tetris game"** — through three different backends: Vertex AI (Google Cloud), vLLM directly, and OGX routing to vLLM. In all three cases, MLflow captured the complete session trace including every tool call, token usage, latency, and the full execution waterfall. The sections below document the telemetry investigation, the tracing prototype, session-level metrics, and the setup guide for productizing this on RHOAI 3.5. |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +--- |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +## RHAIENG-4751 — Inventory OGX Telemetry Hooks and MLflow Integration Points |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +### Summary |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +Agent-level instrumentation via `mlflow autolog claude` works out of the box with any backend. Swapping Vertex AI for vLLM or OGX produces the same trace schema with no changes to the tracing setup. If server-side OGX OTel spans are needed in future, they would be added to the Claude Code stop hook. |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +### OGX Telemetry Capabilities |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +OGX 1.0.2 emits structured logs per request: |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +``` |
| 18 | +INFO Using native /v1/messages passthrough |
| 19 | + base_url=http://vllm-120b-predictor.gpt-oss.svc.cluster.local |
| 20 | + model=vllm/gpt-oss-120b |
| 21 | + HTTP 200 |
| 22 | +``` |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +| Signal | Available | |
| 25 | +|---|---| |
| 26 | +| Model name | ✅ | |
| 27 | +| Backend / provider URL | ✅ | |
| 28 | +| Passthrough status | ✅ | |
| 29 | +| HTTP status code | ✅ | |
| 30 | +| Per-request latency | ✅ | |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +### Agent-side OTel Spans (what we capture today) |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +The spans produced by `mlflow autolog claude` are OTel spans. Every session captures: |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +| Field | Example | |
| 37 | +|---|---| |
| 38 | +| Token count | 29,629 (input + output) | |
| 39 | +| Session latency | 39.62s | |
| 40 | +| Tool call sequence | tool_AskUserQuestion → llm → tool_Write → tool_Read → ... | |
| 41 | +| Prompt / response | Full input and output text | |
| 42 | +| Session ID | Links multi-turn conversations | |
| 43 | +| Model | `gpt-oss-120b`, `claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929`, etc. | |
| 44 | +| Status | OK / error | |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +This works the same whether the backend is Vertex AI, vLLM directly, or OGX → vLLM. If server-side OGX spans are needed in future, they would be added to the same Claude Code stop hook. |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +### Integration Path |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +The Claude Code stop hook is the right integration path. It already captures everything out of the box — tool calls, token usage, latency, session ID — and works the same across Vertex AI, vLLM, and OGX without any changes. If additional server-side metrics are needed (e.g. per-hop vLLM latency, OGX routing decisions), they can be added directly to the same hook since the infrastructure is already there. |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +### Evidence: Same Traces Across All Three Backends |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +We ran **"build me a tetris game"** against all three backends. All three produced the same trace schema. |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +#### Backend 1: Vertex AI |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +| Field | Value | |
| 59 | +|---|---| |
| 60 | +| Model | `claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929` | |
| 61 | +| Tokens | 18,504 | |
| 62 | +| Latency | 2.90 min | |
| 63 | +| Trace ID | `tr-c59dcf7c76c26e4d55255a32694a9bb7` | |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +#### Backend 2: vLLM direct |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +| Field | Value | |
| 70 | +|---|---| |
| 71 | +| Model | `gpt-oss-120b` | |
| 72 | +| Tokens | 46,211 | |
| 73 | +| Latency | 37.82s | |
| 74 | +| Trace ID | `tr-39a858c94eb86c3be340e23541717fe8` | |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +#### Backend 3: OGX 1.0.2 → vLLM |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +| Field | Value | |
| 81 | +|---|---| |
| 82 | +| Model | `gpt-oss-120b` | |
| 83 | +| Tokens | 29,629 | |
| 84 | +| Latency | 39.62s | |
| 85 | +| Trace ID | `tr-26175953d7cb441e3e2da1cc5fc24607` | |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +--- |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +## RHAIENG-4752 & RHAIENG-4753 — Tool Call Traces & Agent Execution Metrics |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +### Summary |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +**RHAIENG-4752** — We prototyped tool call tracing using `mlflow autolog claude`. Every tool Claude Code calls (Write, Read, Edit, Bash, AskUserQuestion, etc.) is captured as a span in MLflow with the tool name, input parameters, output/result, and latency. Tested across three backends with a real coding task — Vertex AI produced 15 spans, vLLM and OGX produced 8 each. MLflow integration works end-to-end. The stop-hook fires after the session so there is no latency impact. |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +**RHAIENG-4753** — On top of the tool call spans, each trace also captures higher-level session metrics: session ID, total duration, input/output token counts, and the full tool call sequence as a waterfall. This answers "what did the agent do and how much did it cost?" for any session. Validated with a complete multi-turn coding task ("build me a tetris game") across all three backends. |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +As you can see in the results below. |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +### Trace Schema |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +``` |
| 104 | +claude_code_conversation (root) |
| 105 | +├── tool_AskUserQuestion — question asked + user answer |
| 106 | +├── tool_EnterPlanMode — agent enters planning |
| 107 | +├── llm — LLM inference call |
| 108 | +├── tool_Bash — command + output |
| 109 | +├── tool_Write — file path + content written |
| 110 | +├── tool_Read — file path + content read |
| 111 | +├── tool_Edit — file path + diff applied |
| 112 | +├── tool_ExitPlanMode — exits planning |
| 113 | +└── llm — final response |
| 114 | +``` |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | +Each span captures: tool name, input parameters, output/result, and per-span latency. Session-level fields on every trace: |
| 117 | + |
| 118 | +| Field | Captured | |
| 119 | +|---|---| |
| 120 | +| Session ID | ✅ | |
| 121 | +| Total duration | ✅ | |
| 122 | +| Input tokens | ✅ | |
| 123 | +| Output tokens | ✅ | |
| 124 | +| Total tokens | ✅ | |
| 125 | +| Tool call sequence (waterfall) | ✅ | |
| 126 | +| Model | ✅ | |
| 127 | +| Status | ✅ | |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +### Results: "Build me a Tetris game" |
| 130 | + |
| 131 | +#### Backend 1: Vertex AI (`claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929`) |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +| Metric | Value | |
| 134 | +|---|---| |
| 135 | +| Session ID | `b679dc2c-...` | |
| 136 | +| Tokens | 18,504 | |
| 137 | +| Latency | 2.90 min | |
| 138 | +| Spans | 15 | |
| 139 | +| Trace ID | `tr-c59dcf7c76c26e4d55255a32694a9bb7` | |
| 140 | + |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | + |
| 143 | +--- |
| 144 | + |
| 145 | +#### Backend 2: vLLM direct (`gpt-oss-120b`) |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | +| Metric | Value | |
| 148 | +|---|---| |
| 149 | +| Session ID | `cc76b223-...` | |
| 150 | +| Tokens | 46,211 | |
| 151 | +| Latency | 37.82s | |
| 152 | +| Spans | 8 | |
| 153 | +| Trace ID | `tr-39a858c94eb86c3be340e23541717fe8` | |
| 154 | + |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | +--- |
| 158 | + |
| 159 | +#### Backend 3: OGX 1.0.2 → vLLM (`gpt-oss-120b`) |
| 160 | + |
| 161 | +| Metric | Value | |
| 162 | +|---|---| |
| 163 | +| Session ID | `980fbcb8-...` | |
| 164 | +| Tokens | 29,629 | |
| 165 | +| Latency | 39.62s | |
| 166 | +| Spans | 8 | |
| 167 | +| Trace ID | `tr-26175953d7cb441e3e2da1cc5fc24607` | |
| 168 | + |
| 169 | + |
| 170 | + |
| 171 | +--- |
| 172 | + |
| 173 | +## RHAIENG-4754 — Observability Setup Guide & RHOAI 3.5 Recommendation |
| 174 | + |
| 175 | +### Summary |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | +MLflow integration works. This guide documents how to hook Claude Code, OGX, and MLflow together on RHOAI — assuming all three are already deployed on the cluster. The setup requires the Red Hat MLflow fork for RHOAI 3.4, which will be replaced by upstream MLflow 3.11 in a future release. |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | +### Prerequisites |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | +The following must already be running on the cluster: |
| 182 | + |
| 183 | +- Claude Code container deployed (see [PR #92](https://github.com/red-hat-data-services/agentic-starter-kits/pull/92)) |
| 184 | +- OGX deployed and serving a model |
| 185 | +- MLflow instance running via the ODH/RHOAI operator with a workspace matching your namespace |
| 186 | + |
| 187 | +### Step-by-Step Setup |
| 188 | + |
| 189 | +#### 1. Add Python + MLflow to the Containerfile |
| 190 | + |
| 191 | +The ODH build of MLflow uses the Red Hat fork which includes the `kubernetes-namespaced` auth plugin not yet in upstream 3.10.x: |
| 192 | + |
| 193 | +```dockerfile |
| 194 | +RUN microdnf install -y python3.12 python3.12-pip |
| 195 | +RUN python3.12 -m pip install --no-cache-dir \ |
| 196 | + 'mlflow[kubernetes] @ git+https://github.com/red-hat-data-services/mlflow.git@rhoai-3.4' |
| 197 | +``` |
| 198 | + |
| 199 | +> This fork requirement will go away when RHOAI ships MLflow 3.11, at which point replace with `mlflow[kubernetes]>=3.11`. |
| 200 | +
|
| 201 | +#### 2. Grant RBAC to the pod's service account |
| 202 | + |
| 203 | +```bash |
| 204 | +oc adm policy add-role-to-user edit -z default -n <your-namespace> |
| 205 | +``` |
| 206 | + |
| 207 | +#### 3. Add MLflow env vars to the deployment |
| 208 | + |
| 209 | +```yaml |
| 210 | +- name: MLFLOW_TRACKING_URI |
| 211 | + value: "https://mlflow.redhat-ods-applications.svc:8443" |
| 212 | +- name: MLFLOW_TRACKING_AUTH |
| 213 | + value: "kubernetes-namespaced" |
| 214 | +- name: MLFLOW_WORKSPACE |
| 215 | + value: "<your-namespace>" |
| 216 | +- name: MLFLOW_EXPERIMENT_NAME |
| 217 | + value: "claude-code-traces" |
| 218 | +- name: MLFLOW_TRACKING_INSECURE_TLS |
| 219 | + value: "true" |
| 220 | +``` |
| 221 | +
|
| 222 | +#### 4. Add OGX env vars to point Claude Code at OGX |
| 223 | +
|
| 224 | +```yaml |
| 225 | +- name: ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL |
| 226 | + value: "https://<your-ogx-route>" |
| 227 | +- name: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY |
| 228 | + value: "fake" |
| 229 | +- name: ANTHROPIC_CUSTOM_MODEL_OPTION |
| 230 | + value: "vllm/<your-model-name>" |
| 231 | +``` |
| 232 | +
|
| 233 | +#### 5. Wire up autolog in the entrypoint |
| 234 | +
|
| 235 | +The entrypoint runs `mlflow autolog claude` at startup and injects auth into the generated `.claude/settings.json`: |
| 236 | + |
| 237 | +```bash |
| 238 | +mlflow autolog claude -u "${MLFLOW_TRACKING_URI}" -n "${MLFLOW_EXPERIMENT_NAME}" /workspace |
| 239 | +
|
| 240 | +python3.12 -c ' |
| 241 | +import json, os |
| 242 | +sf = "/workspace/.claude/settings.json" |
| 243 | +with open(sf) as f: s = json.load(f) |
| 244 | +env = s.setdefault("env", {}) |
| 245 | +env["MLFLOW_TRACKING_AUTH"] = "kubernetes-namespaced" |
| 246 | +env["MLFLOW_WORKSPACE"] = os.environ["MLFLOW_WORKSPACE"] |
| 247 | +env["MLFLOW_TRACKING_INSECURE_TLS"] = "true" |
| 248 | +with open(sf, "w") as f: json.dump(s, f, indent=2) |
| 249 | +' |
| 250 | +``` |
| 251 | + |
| 252 | +#### 6. Verify |
| 253 | + |
| 254 | +```bash |
| 255 | +# Check startup logs |
| 256 | +oc logs deployment/<claude-deployment> | grep -i mlflow |
| 257 | +
|
| 258 | +# Run a test |
| 259 | +oc exec deployment/<claude-deployment> -- bash -c ' |
| 260 | + export HOME=/home/claude-agent && cd /workspace |
| 261 | + ~/.claude/claude-run -p "What is 2+2?" |
| 262 | +' |
| 263 | +
|
| 264 | +# Confirm trace was created |
| 265 | +oc exec deployment/<claude-deployment> -- \ |
| 266 | + tail -3 /workspace/.claude/mlflow/claude_tracing.log |
| 267 | +# Expected: "Created MLflow trace: tr-..." |
| 268 | +``` |
| 269 | + |
| 270 | +### Recommendation for RHOAI 3.5 |
| 271 | + |
| 272 | +**Productize `mlflow autolog claude` as the agent tracing path.** |
| 273 | + |
| 274 | +It works across all backends (Vertex AI, vLLM, OGX) with no changes to the tracing setup. It captures tool calls, token usage, latency, and session metadata out of the box. The only overhead is the stop-hook which runs after the session ends — zero impact on agent response times. |
| 275 | + |
| 276 | +When RHOAI ships MLflow 3.11, drop the Red Hat fork and use upstream `mlflow[kubernetes]>=3.11`. |
0 commit comments