build(deps-dev): bump eslint-plugin-sonarjs from 4.0.3 to 4.1.0 #788
pr-check.yaml
on: pull_request
linter, formatters
43s
Matrix: unit-tests
Annotations
10 errors
|
linter, formatters:
packages/frontend/src/lib/selects/Select.spec.ts#L113
Prefer a more specific assertion instead of this generic one, e.g. "expect(items).toHaveLength(2)"
|
|
linter, formatters:
packages/frontend/src/lib/selects/Select.spec.ts#L85
Prefer a more specific assertion instead of this generic one, e.g. "expect(items[1].children).toHaveLength(1)"
|
|
linter, formatters:
packages/frontend/src/lib/selects/Select.spec.ts#L83
Prefer a more specific assertion instead of this generic one, e.g. "expect(items[0].children).toHaveLength(1)"
|
|
linter, formatters:
packages/frontend/src/lib/selects/Select.spec.ts#L82
Prefer a more specific assertion instead of this generic one, e.g. "expect(items).toHaveLength(2)"
|
|
linter, formatters:
packages/frontend/src/lib/selects/Select.spec.ts#L51
Prefer a more specific assertion instead of this generic one, e.g. "expect(items).toHaveLength(2)"
|
|
linter, formatters:
packages/frontend/src/lib/selects/ContainerProviderConnectionSelect.spec.ts#L58
Prefer a more specific assertion instead of this generic one, e.g. "expect(items).toHaveLength(2)"
|
|
linter, formatters:
packages/frontend/src/lib/icons/RepositoryIcon.spec.ts#L58
Prefer a more specific assertion instead of this generic one, e.g. "expect(paths).toHaveLength(2)"
|
|
linter, formatters:
packages/frontend/src/lib/icons/RepositoryIcon.spec.ts#L44
Prefer a more specific assertion instead of this generic one, e.g. "expect(paths).toHaveLength(2)"
|
|
linter, formatters:
packages/backend/src/services/webview-service.ts#L70
Simplify this regular expression to reduce its runtime, as it has super-linear performance due to backtracking
|
|
linter, formatters:
packages/backend/src/services/webview-service.ts#L56
Simplify this regular expression to reduce its runtime, as it has super-linear performance due to backtracking
|