Routing skill for the fullsend agent platform. Groom Jira tickets for agent-readiness, then bridge them to GitHub Issues for fullsend processing.
| Command | Description |
|---|---|
groom <KEY> |
Score and improve a Jira ticket against a 6-dimension agent-readiness rubric |
bridge <KEY> |
Create a GitHub Issue from a groomed ticket, linking both sides |
The grooming workflow and agent-readiness rubric are derived from platform-frontend-ai-dev, the autonomous dev bot built by the ConsoleDot Platform Experience team.
Key inspirations:
prompts/groom.md— conversational grooming prompt that walks users through what the bot needs to pick up a ticket. Our 6-dimension scoring rubric formalizes the same checks Rehor performs implicitly.needs-investigationworkflow — Rehor treats investigation tickets as fundamentally different from implementation tickets (report findings, don't code). Our groom workflow adopts this distinction.project-repos.json— Rehor's repo-to-persona mapping. Ourreferences/repo-mapping.mdfollows the same pattern but uses the existingrhdh-jiracomponent catalog as the source of truth.- Primary label routing — Rehor uses team-specific labels (
hcc-ai-framework,hcc-ai-ui) for triage routing. Our bridge uses thefullsendlabel for the same purpose.
The key architectural difference: Rehor is a monolith (groom + execute + triage in one agent), while fullsend separates preparation (this skill) from execution (the fullsend agent on GitHub).