Review environments documentation

[FelipeMartins96]

Each environment code should have a descriptive and correct documentation about the environment, each of the available environemnts should be checked in the information is correct.

[FelipeMartins96]

rSoccer/rsoccer_gym/vss/env_vss/vss_gym.py

Line 20 in d73b862

Normalized Bounds to [-1.25, 1.25]

Wrong bounds value, this environment uses the VSS base NORM_BOUNDS which is set to 1.2

[LiviaCavalcanti]

Sorry for my lack of knowlegde, but how should the review proceed? What must be checked to validate environment documentation?

[FelipeMartins96]

Sorry for my lack of knowlegde, but how should the review proceed? What must be checked to validate environment documentation?

I believe that the environment documentation should be a summary of what is implemented on the code, so reviewing it should be about validating for inconsistencies about what the documentation say about the environment and what is implemented on the code.

Inconsistencies arises as modifications were done to the environments code but were not updated on the environment documentation, such as those normalized bounds demonstrated on:

rSoccer/rsoccer_gym/vss/env_vss/vss_gym.py

Line 20 in d73b862

Normalized Bounds to [-1.25, 1.25]

Wrong bounds value, this environment uses the VSS base NORM_BOUNDS which is set to 1.2

Where the observations are normalized using the vss base environment normalization method which has a bound set to 1.2. We believe that there are other documentation errors, so it should be checked. We try to document the following environment information:

• Description:
• Observation:
• Actions:
• Reward:
• Starting State:
• Episode Termination: