Skip to content

Commit 83ecf61

Browse files
committed
Filled scoresheets with content from original PDF files
1 parent 8106f0b commit 83ecf61

File tree

5 files changed

+225
-60
lines changed

5 files changed

+225
-60
lines changed

onstage_scoresheets/01_technical_demonstration_video.adoc

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
1-
= [.underline]#Technical Demonstration Video# Score Sheet 2025
1+
= OnStage [.underline]#Technical Demonstration Video# Score Sheet 2025
22
{docdate}
33
:toc: left
44
:sectanchors:

onstage_scoresheets/02_technical_description_poster.adoc

Lines changed: 0 additions & 59 deletions
This file was deleted.
Lines changed: 92 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
1+
= OnStage [.underline]#Technical Interview# Score Sheet 2025
2+
{docdate}
3+
:toc: left
4+
:sectanchors:
5+
:sectlinks:
6+
:xrefstyle: full
7+
:section-refsig: Section
8+
:sectnums:
9+
10+
ifdef::basebackend-html[]
11+
++++
12+
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://use.fontawesome.com/releases/v5.3.1/css/all.css" integrity="sha384-mzrmE5qonljUremFsqc01SB46JvROS7bZs3IO2EmfFsd15uHvIt+Y8vEf7N7fWAU" crossorigin="anonymous">
13+
<script src="https://hypothes.is/embed.js" async></script>
14+
++++
15+
endif::basebackend-html[]
16+
17+
:icons: font
18+
:numbered:
19+
20+
21+
[cols="8,40,>.>3"]
22+
|===
23+
|Category |Examples of how high marks may be achieved are: |Mark
24+
25+
|*Programming*
26+
a|*Ability to explain the program and the interactions between the hardware and software:*
27+
[compact]
28+
* Choice of programming language
29+
* Difficulties with the software
30+
* Development of appropriate models, datasets and/or libraries to solve programming solutions
31+
* Efficient and optimized programming with clear documentation and commenting with evidence of version control
32+
* Development of calibration, testing and debugging functionalities
33+
* Usage of AI / AR technology
34+
|/7
35+
36+
|*Electro- mechanical Systems*
37+
a|*Ability to explain why electromechanical design choices were made:*
38+
[compact]
39+
* Choice of materials, microcontrollers and actuators
40+
* Development of custom electronics (including PCBs)
41+
* Power management, regulation, and battery choices
42+
* Design choices are made to ensure systems are reliable and durable
43+
* Sustainable design choices including the choice of materials
44+
45+
*Explain how systems are fit for purpose - examples include:*
46+
[compact]
47+
* Complex mobility - omnidirectional/legged robots
48+
* Stable builds, system kinematics and design of custom components
49+
* High precision systems including pneumatics
50+
* Functional arms/hands/faces
51+
* Robotic arms for manipulation
52+
* Automatic balance system
53+
|/7
54+
55+
|*Sensor and Communication Systems*
56+
a|*Ability to explain the role of sensors and communication in the systems and how the robots interact with the stage environment:*
57+
[compact]
58+
* Robot systems can dynamically respond to unplanned events
59+
* Robots can sense their environment and use the information to dynamically respond with an action
60+
* Integration of multi sensor systems to develop solutions
61+
* Development of communication between sensors
62+
* Creation of communication architectures (asymmetric communication)
63+
64+
*Explain how systems are fit for purpose - examples include:*
65+
[compact]
66+
* Visual/Audio recognition
67+
* Developed guidance, navigation, and control systems
68+
* Robot-Robot and/or [.underline]Natural Robot-Human interaction
69+
* Stage/Robot localization systems
70+
|/7
71+
72+
|*Innovation and Feature Development*
73+
a|*Ability to explain and showcase innovative features or robotic components*
74+
[compact]
75+
* Innovation achieved with clear evidence of testing, research and development. Innovations that can inspire future competitors
76+
* Teams are able to explain developments based on past feedback and performance results
77+
|/6
78+
79+
|*Teamwork and Collegiality*
80+
|Evidence of team collaboration, problem solving and spirit in the performance and competition.
81+
|/3
82+
83+
|*Deductions* _(At discretion of judges up to -15)_
84+
|Judges believe the work was not done by team members
85+
86+
Team members are unable to explain their technical involvement with the robot
87+
|
88+
89+
|*Total Score*
90+
|
91+
|*/30*
92+
|===
Lines changed: 49 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
1+
= OnStage [.underline]#Technical Description Poster# Score Sheet 2025
2+
{docdate}
3+
:toc: left
4+
:sectanchors:
5+
:sectlinks:
6+
:xrefstyle: full
7+
:section-refsig: Section
8+
:sectnums:
9+
10+
ifdef::basebackend-html[]
11+
++++
12+
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://use.fontawesome.com/releases/v5.3.1/css/all.css" integrity="sha384-mzrmE5qonljUremFsqc01SB46JvROS7bZs3IO2EmfFsd15uHvIt+Y8vEf7N7fWAU" crossorigin="anonymous">
13+
<script src="https://hypothes.is/embed.js" async></script>
14+
++++
15+
endif::basebackend-html[]
16+
17+
:icons: font
18+
:numbered:
19+
20+
21+
[cols="8,40,>.>3"]
22+
|===
23+
|Category |Examples of how high marks may be achieved are: |Mark
24+
25+
|*Abstract and Performance Description*
26+
a|[compact]
27+
* Clear overview of the performance idea and how the chosen technology adds to the performance as described in the abstract
28+
* Demonstrates authenticity in the project and performance development
29+
|/6
30+
31+
|*Technology and Innovation*
32+
a|[compact]
33+
* Electromechanical, sensors, communication, and software choices are clearly described
34+
* Clear definition of the four chosen features with evidence of learning through the use of words, diagrams and images
35+
* Depth and understanding of the four chosen features and how the chosen features add value to the performance
36+
|/6
37+
38+
|*Poster design*
39+
a|[compact]
40+
* Poster submitted using the correct format in paper format and virtually
41+
* The Poster should be presented in the style of a research poster
42+
* The Poster is easy to read and understand
43+
* The Poster is pleasing to look at (good contrast, good balance between wording and imagery)
44+
|/3
45+
46+
|*Total Score*
47+
|
48+
|*/15*
49+
|===
Lines changed: 83 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
1+
= OnStage [.underline]#Performance# Score Sheet 2025
2+
{docdate}
3+
:toc: left
4+
:sectanchors:
5+
:sectlinks:
6+
:xrefstyle: full
7+
:section-refsig: Section
8+
:sectnums:
9+
10+
ifdef::basebackend-html[]
11+
++++
12+
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://use.fontawesome.com/releases/v5.3.1/css/all.css" integrity="sha384-mzrmE5qonljUremFsqc01SB46JvROS7bZs3IO2EmfFsd15uHvIt+Y8vEf7N7fWAU" crossorigin="anonymous">
13+
<script src="https://hypothes.is/embed.js" async></script>
14+
++++
15+
endif::basebackend-html[]
16+
17+
:icons: font
18+
:numbered:
19+
20+
21+
[cols="8,40,>.>3"]
22+
|===
23+
|Category |Examples of how high marks may be achieved are: |Mark
24+
25+
|*Visual Impact and Quality of the Whole Performance*
26+
a|*The robotic performance is engaging. For example:*
27+
[compact]
28+
* The theme is clearly shown throughout the performance.
29+
* Performance entertains and triggers an emotional response from the audience.
30+
* The performance area and set are used effectively.
31+
* Robot costumes add value to the performance.[compact]
32+
|/12
33+
34+
|*Robotic Interaction and System Integration*
35+
a|[compact]
36+
* Complex or challenging movements that fit the theme and add value to the performance.
37+
* Interesting, smooth, natural interaction between robots and/or humans.
38+
* Humans ensure they never distract the audience from robot actions, and their movements enhance the overall robotic performance.
39+
* All robotic systems (e.g. sensors, motors) are used effectively, in multiple ways, and throughout the performance.
40+
* Props are interactive and add value to the performance.
41+
|/12
42+
43+
|*Effective implementation of features presented by the team.*
44+
a|*Implementation of four chosen features:*
45+
46+
Excellent implementation, visibility, and impact - features works as expected and add extensive value to the performance:
47+
48+
[cols="3,>1"]
49+
!===
50+
51+
! Feature 1:
52+
!/4
53+
54+
! Feature 2:
55+
!/4
56+
57+
! Feature 3:
58+
!/4
59+
60+
! Feature 4:
61+
!/4
62+
63+
!===
64+
65+
|/16
66+
67+
68+
|*Deductions* _(-3 for each at discretion of the judges)_
69+
|-3 for each unplanned human intervention inside the marked stage area (including remote or human controlled actions)
70+
71+
-3 for each restart
72+
73+
-3 each 10 seconds over the allotted time (on stage or performance) Performances that do not reach the minimum performance time will be scored zero
74+
75+
_If a problem is not the fault of a team no deductions will be applied_
76+
|
77+
78+
|*Total Score*
79+
|
80+
|*/40*
81+
|===
82+
83+
_Teams that infringe the rules will be warned that such infringements will not be allowed in the second performance._

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)