Status (2026-07-06). The abstract reducer layer + the (140) engine discharge are complete
(all std-3, sorry-free, in GQ2/RecursionSplice.lean). This doc is the handoff for the remaining
concrete Prop-8.8 / source pass — the exact hypotheses to discharge, with their En
instantiation, so prop_8_9 (SectionEight.lean:2143, sorry) can be closed.
The final proof is exact prop_8_9_of … (co-owned SectionEight.lean, trivial edit, done last),
fed two RecursionInputs bundles (one per source B.bA/B.bF) + one shared witness. Each
RecursionInputs is ⟨stageR136, half139, phase140⟩; the three reducers below produce those fields
verbatim (conclusions already verified to match the field RHSs).
Build once from En : RF.Enrichment (frame-level, so shared across bA/bF):
| component | recipe | obligation |
|---|---|---|
DT := Module.Dual (ZMod 2) En.Vmod (= V^∨)DT := (T^∨)^C = fixedPts C (ElemDual T_B-model), dim r — the paper's phase index D with (140)-prefactor 2^{r+1} = 2·#D; Efp ≅ D^∨ |
hDT : Nat.card (Efp^∨) = Nat.card DT via finite double-duality |
Fintype DT from finiteness of T_B ✓ |
G0 := gaussSum (En.qbar l₀ h₀) |
so hG0 : gaussSum Q = G0 is rfl (with Q := En.qbar l h) |
l-independence: gaussSum (qbar l h) constant in l (Arf invariant of the nonsingular qbar; all qbar l h share it — source 5.15/5.16 / §6 Gauss-sum content) |
μ := Nat.card En.Vmod * Nat.card (TCocycle (En.radData l₀ h₀) …) — the paper's (132) value #B¹(V)·#Z¹(T) (c1s repair, LANDED 2026-07-07: the engine is fed the bare Z¹(T)-count μ₀ and concludes with the slot (Nat.card W * μ₀ : ℕ)) |
the T-cocycle count times #V |
l-independence + the hμ below (both for the μ₀ factor; the #V factor is l-free) |
phase := phaseFamily (fun ζ => DeltaScalar (En.dat l h) γ_ζ δ_ζ a_ζ) hcoc hl hr |
AffineTLift.phaseFamily / centralCoverOfCocycle |
DeltaScalar is a normalized 2-cocycle (hcoc/hl/hr) — the deep phase-cover content; γ_ζ/δ_ζ/a_ζ are the per-character edge-killing shear of prop_8_8_target |
The phase construction is coupled to hphase (§2): the Δ = DeltaScalar … used here must be the
one in hphase's sign-sum. So the witness phase and phase140's hphase are one build.
RecursionInputs.phase140 := fun l h _hN => phase140_of_nonsingular RF b F μ₀ G0 DT phase l h (En.radData l h) rfl hC_l Dsc_l htriv hfg Lin hLin (En.qbar l h) (En.hquad l h) (En.hns l h) κ ε (hμ l h) (hM l h) hDT (enrichment_card_Vmod RF En) rfl (hphase l h)
(post-c1s: μ₀ = the bare Z¹(T)-count; the bundle's μ-parameter is Nat.card En.Vmod * μ₀
— the engine's conclusion slot (Nat.card W * μ₀ : ℕ) is a cast ℕ-atom, so with that witness the
field still closes by exact.)
with W := En.Vmod, Q := En.qbar l h, D := En.radData l h (hD := rfl). Engine data
already discharged: hquad/hns (En fields), a_χ = polarInverseL … (internal), hWV
(enrichment_card_Vmod), hG0/hDT (rfl). Residual (per l, h, the descent case):
Lin : En.Vmod →ₗ[ZMod 2] Efp,hLin(surjective),κ,ε— the C-image linear map and the per-ρconstraint data(κ_ρ, ε_ρ).Efp= theC-stage image space;Lin= the descent-to-Cmap. From the concretescalarCover/piBCstructure.hM l h— ⚠ SHAPE CORRECTED (Fable 2026-07-06, P-16d6c ⚠ Bug 1): as originally written (#(central red_T image) = N(κρ, ερ)) this is unsatisfiable — the LHS is a positive multiple of#B¹_{Γ,ρ}(V) = #V(freeB¹-translation byM_B-conjugation), the RHS≤ #W = #Vstrictly. The true statement (and the c1s-repaired engine hypothesis — repair LANDED 2026-07-07) is… = Nat.card W * Nat.card {x : En.Vmod // Lin x = κ ρ ∧ En.qbar l h x = ε ρ}, with thephase140_of_*conclusions'μ-slot correspondingly#W·μ(paper (132):μ = |B¹(V)|·|Z¹(T)|). Content unchanged otherwise: the scalar-cover square relation (En.q/En.hq),lemma_6_21/6_22,prop_8_8_target(✓). The deep group-theory↔quadratic bridge. Seedocs/p16d6c-handoff.md§⚠ + §c1 (authoritative).hphase l h : (∑ᶠ χ : V^∨, ∑ ρ, sign (χ (κ ρ) + ε ρ + En.qbar l h (polarInverseL … χ))) = ∑ᶠ ζ : DT, (2 * nPhase (phase ζ) − exactImageCount b F RF.TC)— the character↔phase-cover reindex: matchesV^∨-characters to theD_T-indexed phase covers,sign(…) = 2·nPhase − e. Couples to the witnessphase/Δ(§1). Prop 8.8 content.hμ l h : ∀ ρ, Nat.card (TCocycle (En.radData l h) (rhoPrime …ρ)) = μ— μ-independence: the crossedZ¹_{Γ,ρ}(T)count isρ-independent (theρ-twisted conjugation actions onTall give the same count). Source 5.15/5.16. Needs[Fintype (BoundaryLifts b F RF.TC)](fromhfg).
κ/ε/Lin/hLin are concrete C-descent data; hM/hphase are Prop 8.8; hμ is source.
UPDATE 2026-07-06: this section's "blocked on the co-owned
EnrichmentR-stage extension" framing is obsolete. TheRObstructionData(Dobs) is built directly against the concreteblockFrameImpl(P-17c ✓) with noEnrichmentedit — it is DONE asblockRObstructionDatainGQ2/BlockRStage.lean(std-3), wired to (136) byblockStageR136. Only the source residueshsep_hom/hZcount(+htriv/hcard/hfg,hE2free) remain, and they are supplied per-Γ at the P-16d6e assembly (Γ-specific 5.15/5.16 counts). The authoritative, current spec forstageR136isdocs/p16d6a-handoff.md; the paragraph below is kept for the residue statements only.
RecursionInputs.stageR136 := stageR136_ofRSepData RF Dobs htriv hcard hfg hE2 hsep_hom hZcount
Blocker (infra): needs Dobs : RObstructionData RF, which Enrichment does not carry.
RObstructionData (extends RCoverData) needs the R-stage cover-map family + the D_R
obstruction pairing pair : D_Rmod →ₗ (R → 𝔽₂) — the analog of q/descend/qbar but for the
R = ker π_B stage, which the current Enrichment (M_B/V side only) lacks.
Action: extend Enrichment (co-owned SectionEight.lean structure — owner sign-off) with
the R-stage fields (mirroring q/hq/descend/qbar/hns for R), then build Dobs from them.
Residues once Dobs exists: hsep_hom (the (R^∨)^C-separation, obs g = 0 ⟹ ∃ hom lift — the
concrete R+C-action property, not abstractly derivable), hZcount (#RCocycle = z_R, from
5.15/5.16), hE2 : ∀ e:E, e² = 1 (from lemma_7_3), hcard : #H²(Γ,𝔽₂) = 2.
RecursionInputs.half139 := fun l h _hN => half139_via_radData RF b F En l h hfg (hlem86M l h) (hMcountM l h)
Residual:
hlem86M l h : ∀ ρ, 2 * #{central M-lifts of rhoPrime …ρ} = #(M-lifts …)— the source Lemma 8.6 half-torsor count.G_ℚ₂:lemma_8_6_local✓ (SectionEight.lean:1301).Γ_A:lemma_8_6_gammaA✗ = P-16c (SectionEight.lean:1288,sorry).hMcountM l h : ∀ ρ, #(M-lifts of rhoPrime …ρ) = |M_B|²— the2^{2·dim}M-lift count, fromprop_5_16/prop_5_15✓.
Only Γ_A is blocked, on P-16c. G_ℚ₂'s half139 is dischargeable now.
- μ-independence
hμ(source 5.15/5.16) — self-contained; unblocks thehfibhalf of (140). hM+Lin/κ/ε(Prop 8.8 count) — the group-theory↔quadratic bridge; the largest piece.hphase+ the witnessphase/Δ(Prop 8.8 reindex) — one coupled build; needs the DeltaScalar 2-cocycle proofs +prop_8_8_target's per-character shear.G0/μl-independence (Arf / source) — completes the witness.half139forG_ℚ₂(lemma_8_6_local+ 5.15/5.16) — quick;Γ_Awaits on P-16c.stageR136: land theEnrichmentR-stage extension (owner sign-off), buildDobs, dischargehsep_hom/hZcount/hE2.- Assemble the two
RecursionInputs,exact prop_8_9_of …intoSectionEight.lean.
prop_8_9_of · half139_via_radData · zBC_eq_sum_centralOver ·
central_card_eq_reductions_mul_tcocycle · centralOver_card_eq_reductions_mul_tcocycle ·
zBC_eq_mu_mul_reductionCount · phase140_ofPhaseData · lemma_8_5_aggregated ·
phase140_of_gaussCorrespondence · polarInverseL (+_spec) · phase140_of_nonsingular ·
enrichment_card_Vmod.