|
1 | | -# Security Policy |
2 | | - |
3 | | -## Dependency Security Management |
4 | | - |
5 | | -This project has implemented several layers of protection to manage and mitigate security vulnerabilities in dependencies: |
6 | | - |
7 | | -### Automated Vulnerability Fixes |
8 | | - |
9 | | -When you install dependencies with `npm install`, our post-install scripts automatically: |
10 | | - |
11 | | -1. Resolve dependency conflicts that could cause compatibility issues |
12 | | -2. Fix known security vulnerabilities by upgrading affected packages to safe versions |
13 | | -3. Configure npm to ignore low/moderate severity issues that only affect development dependencies |
14 | | - |
15 | | -### Running Security Audits |
16 | | - |
17 | | -To check for security vulnerabilities: |
18 | | - |
| 1 | +# AuditorSEC Security Policy |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## Security Cockpit v1.0 — Status 2026-05-01 |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +### Infrastructure Security (auditorsec.com) |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +| Check | Status | Notes | |
| 8 | +|-------|--------|-------| |
| 9 | +| SSL/TLS Grade | **A+** | All 3 IPs, isExceptional, no warnings | |
| 10 | +| TLS Version | **1.2+** | TLS 1.0/1.1 disabled via Cloudflare | |
| 11 | +| HTTP→HTTPS | **Enabled** | Cloudflare redirect rule deployed | |
| 12 | +| HSTS | **Enabled** | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload | |
| 13 | +| PQC Readiness | **TLS 1.3** | Verified via Intel Monitor | |
| 14 | +| Security Headers | **Configured** | CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type, Referrer-Policy | |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +### Automated Security Workflows |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +#### intel-monitor.yml (Every Monday 08:00 UTC) |
| 19 | +- Semgrep SAST static analysis |
| 20 | +- SSL Labs API grade check |
| 21 | +- Security headers audit |
| 22 | +- DeFi bridges monitoring via DeFiLlama API |
| 23 | +- PQC TLS 1.3 readiness |
| 24 | +- Auto-creates GitHub Issue on critical findings |
| 25 | +- **First run:** SUCCESS, SSL A+, no critical findings |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +#### promptfoo-ai-security.yml (Wednesday + PRs) |
| 28 | +- Prompt injection resistance test |
| 29 | +- Reentrancy detection accuracy |
| 30 | +- Hallucination prevention check |
| 31 | +- Requires `OPENROUTER_API_KEY` secret (free at openrouter.ai) |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +#### docker-compose.changedetection.yml (Self-hosted) |
19 | 34 | ```bash |
20 | | -# Regular audit (may show known dev dependency issues) |
21 | | -npm audit |
22 | | - |
23 | | -# Production-only audit (ignores dev dependencies) |
24 | | -npm audit --production |
25 | | - |
26 | | -# Audit only for critical issues |
27 | | -npm run audit:all |
28 | | - |
29 | | -# Fix critical vulnerabilities (be careful with breaking changes) |
30 | | -npm run fix:vulnerabilities |
| 35 | +docker compose -f docker/docker-compose.changedetection.yml up -d |
| 36 | +# Web UI: http://localhost:5000 |
31 | 37 | ``` |
| 38 | +Monitors: DeFi bridges, OpenZeppelin advisories, NIST PQC, Solidity releases, auditorsec.com |
32 | 39 |
|
33 | | -### Handling Known Issues |
34 | | - |
35 | | -Some development dependencies (like testing tools) may have vulnerabilities that don't affect production code. These are tracked and managed through: |
| 40 | +### Security Cockpits |
36 | 41 |
|
37 | | -1. Package resolutions in `package.json` |
38 | | -2. Specific settings in `.npmrc` |
39 | | -3. CI-specific configuration in `.npmrc-ci` |
40 | | -4. Acknowledged exceptions in `.nsprc` |
| 42 | +1. **Solidity Engineering Cockpit** — Smart contract audit reports (reentrancy, overflow, access control, front-running) |
| 43 | +2. **California DROP Privacy Cockpit** — CCPA/CALOPPA compliance, PII exposure, data retention audit |
| 44 | +3. **AuditorSEC Intel Monitor** — SSL, DeFi bridges, PQC, security advisories — weekly automation |
41 | 45 |
|
42 | | -#### Known Development Dependencies with Vulnerabilities |
| 46 | +### DeFi Bridge Intelligence (2026-05-01) |
43 | 47 |
|
44 | | -The following development dependencies have vulnerabilities that don't affect production code: |
| 48 | +| Bridge | 24h Volume | Risk Notes | |
| 49 | +|--------|-----------|------------| |
| 50 | +| USDT0 | $182M | Liquidity concentration risk | |
| 51 | +| Relay | $88M | Cross-chain message validation | |
| 52 | +| Hyperliquid | $85M | Centralization risk | |
| 53 | +| Polygon PoS | $45M | Validator set monitoring | |
| 54 | +| Across | $27M | Optimistic bridge model risk | |
45 | 55 |
|
46 | | -1. **lodash.set** - Has a prototype pollution vulnerability (GHSA-p6mc-m468-83gw) |
47 | | - - Used by: lighthouse in @lhci/cli (development testing tool) |
48 | | - - Mitigation: Overridden in package.json, exceptions tracked in .nsprc |
49 | | - - Production impact: None (not included in production builds) |
| 56 | +### Vulnerability Reporting |
50 | 57 |
|
51 | | -2. **cookie** - Accept cookie with out of bounds characters (GHSA-pxg6-pf52-xh8x) |
52 | | - - Used by: raven in lighthouse in @lhci/cli (development testing tool) |
53 | | - - Mitigation: Overridden in package.json, exceptions tracked in .nsprc |
54 | | - - Production impact: None (not included in production builds) |
| 58 | +**DO NOT** open public GitHub issues for security vulnerabilities. |
55 | 59 |
|
56 | | -### CI Security Checking |
| 60 | +Report privately via: |
| 61 | +- GitHub Advisory: https://github.com/romanchaa997/Audityzer/security/advisories/new |
| 62 | +- Email: security@auditorsec.com |
57 | 63 |
|
58 | | -Our GitHub workflow automatically checks for security issues on: |
59 | | -- Every push to main branches |
60 | | -- Pull requests to protected branches |
61 | | -- Weekly scheduled scans |
| 64 | +Response SLA: 48h acknowledgment, 7 days for critical issues. |
62 | 65 |
|
63 | | -### Reporting New Vulnerabilities |
| 66 | +### Known Issues |
64 | 67 |
|
65 | | -If you discover a security vulnerability in this project, please report it by: |
| 68 | +CodeQL scan: **32 alerts (6 high severity)** — remediation in progress. |
| 69 | +See: [Security & Quality](https://github.com/romanchaa997/Audityzer/security) tab. |
66 | 70 |
|
67 | | -1. **DO NOT** create a public GitHub issue |
68 | | -2. Send details to [security@example.com](mailto:security@example.com) |
69 | | -3. Include steps to reproduce and potential impact |
| 71 | +### Dependency Security |
70 | 72 |
|
71 | | -## Security Best Practices |
| 73 | +This project uses automated vulnerability management: |
| 74 | +- Post-install scripts resolve dependency conflicts |
| 75 | +- Critical vulns auto-upgraded to safe versions |
| 76 | +- Production-only audit: `npm audit --production` |
72 | 77 |
|
73 | | -When working with this codebase: |
| 78 | +### Setup OPENROUTER_API_KEY (for AI red-team) |
74 | 79 |
|
75 | | -1. Keep all dependencies updated |
76 | | -2. Run security audits before deploying |
77 | | -3. Never expose sensitive credentials in code |
78 | | -4. Follow the security patterns established in the codebase |
79 | | - |
80 | | -## Responsible Disclosure |
| 80 | +```bash |
| 81 | +# 1. Register free: https://openrouter.ai/keys |
| 82 | +# 2. Add secret: |
| 83 | +gh secret set OPENROUTER_API_KEY --body "sk-or-..." |
| 84 | +``` |
81 | 85 |
|
82 | | -We follow responsible disclosure practices and will: |
83 | | -- Acknowledge receipt within 48 hours |
84 | | -- Provide regular updates on progress |
85 | | -- Credit discoverers (if desired) |
86 | | -- Publish details after fixes are available |
| 86 | +--- |
| 87 | +*AuditorSEC Security Cockpit v1.0 | Updated: 2026-05-01 | Adaptive Security Development Initiative* |
0 commit comments