Thanks for making this work open-source.
I have tried to replicate your results using Taiwanese datasets.
I have generated images with dimension size of 50 and a period size of 20.
I have done testing with a random forest classifier.
I have tried a different number of estimators to check the improvement of the result.
I get accuracy around 0.55 with the shared Taiwanese dataset.
I would like to know whether you have a guess about what I could be missing?
I would like to know also why there is such a big gap between my results using the exact same pipeline and the results mentioned in the paper.
Thanks for making this work open-source.
I have tried to replicate your results using Taiwanese datasets.
I have generated images with dimension size of 50 and a period size of 20.
I have done testing with a random forest classifier.
I have tried a different number of estimators to check the improvement of the result.
I get accuracy around 0.55 with the shared Taiwanese dataset.
I would like to know whether you have a guess about what I could be missing?
I would like to know also why there is such a big gap between my results using the exact same pipeline and the results mentioned in the paper.