Description
Community Note
- Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request. Searching for pre-existing feature requests helps us consolidate datapoints for identical requirements into a single place, thank you!
- Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.
- If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment.
Overview of the Issue
Currently when a PR is merged without atlantis apply
we end up in a situation where reality doesn't match desired state described with terraform. There is also no way to apply changes post-merge without raising a dummy PR.
At the same time, in GitHub, it's sometimes not possible to prevent people form merging PRs. For example anyone with repo admin access will get implicit push access and thus will be able to merge approved PRs without having to apply first.
In practice this means that there is currently no way to prevent human errors (people merging approved PRs without running atlantis apply
first).
I'd like to propose optional functionality to allow atlantis to be configured to apply changes on PR merges. This would allow organizations who cannot remove push or admin access from repos to ensure changes are applied on merges without relying on humans to remember to atlantis apply
I realize that there is a possibility that apply fails and we'll end up being out of sync but this is a trade off that some organizations might be willing to accept.
Reproduction Steps
Open a PR and then merge it without running atlantis apply
first. This will result in code being out of sync with reality and there is no way to retroactively apply changes.
The only workaround I found is to open 2nd dummy PR and ensure it's applied before merging.
Logs
Environment details
I'm on atlantis v 0.18.2 but I believe older/newer versions will also be affected by this.
Additional Context
This feature was requested in 2017 but wasn't implemented back then: #36
There is also discussion about the mergable limitations here: #1316
Apply on merge would allow us to create workflow similar to that hashicorp describe in a docs. This makes me think that the functionality is non-controversial as hashicorp themselves describe it.
Activity