Make _Unwind_Action a type alias, not enum
#138573
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It's bitflags in practice, so an enum is unsound, as an enum must only have the described values. The x86_64 psABI declares it as a `typedef int _Unwind_Action`, which seems reasonable. I made a newtype first but that was more annoying than just a typedef. We don't really use this value for much other than a short check.
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
seems fine to me. |
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
jhpratt
added a commit
to jhpratt/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2025
…, r=workingjubilee Make `_Unwind_Action` a type alias, not enum It's bitflags in practice, so an enum is unsound, as an enum must only have the described values. The x86_64 psABI declares it as a `typedef int _Unwind_Action`, which seems reasonable. I made a newtype first but that was more annoying than just a typedef. We don't really use this value for much other than a short check. I ran `x check library --target aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu,x86_64-pc-windows-gnu,x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx,x86_64-unknown-haiku,x86_64-unknown-fuchsi a,x86_64-unknown-freebsd,x86_64-unknown-dragonfly,x86_64-unknown-netbsd,x86_64-unknown-openbsd,x86_64-unknown-redox,riscv64-linux-android,armv7-unknown-freebsd` (and some more but they failed to build for other reasons :D) fixes rust-lang#138558 r? workingjubilee have fun
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2025
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#136293 (document capacity for ZST as example) - rust-lang#136355 (Add `*_value` methods to proc_macro lib) - rust-lang#136359 (doc all differences of ptr:copy(_nonoverlapping) with memcpy and memmove) - rust-lang#136816 (refactor `notable_traits_button` to use iterator combinators instead of for loop) - rust-lang#138363 (Add `From<{integer}>` for `f16`/`f128` impls) - rust-lang#138552 (Misc print request handling cleanups + a centralized test for print request stability gating) - rust-lang#138573 (Make `_Unwind_Action` a type alias, not enum) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2025
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#136293 (document capacity for ZST as example) - rust-lang#136359 (doc all differences of ptr:copy(_nonoverlapping) with memcpy and memmove) - rust-lang#136816 (refactor `notable_traits_button` to use iterator combinators instead of for loop) - rust-lang#138552 (Misc print request handling cleanups + a centralized test for print request stability gating) - rust-lang#138573 (Make `_Unwind_Action` a type alias, not enum) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#138573 - Noratrieb:no-unsound-bad-bonk-bonk, r=workingjubilee Make `_Unwind_Action` a type alias, not enum It's bitflags in practice, so an enum is unsound, as an enum must only have the described values. The x86_64 psABI declares it as a `typedef int _Unwind_Action`, which seems reasonable. I made a newtype first but that was more annoying than just a typedef. We don't really use this value for much other than a short check. I ran `x check library --target aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu,x86_64-pc-windows-gnu,x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx,x86_64-unknown-haiku,x86_64-unknown-fuchsi a,x86_64-unknown-freebsd,x86_64-unknown-dragonfly,x86_64-unknown-netbsd,x86_64-unknown-openbsd,x86_64-unknown-redox,riscv64-linux-android,armv7-unknown-freebsd` (and some more but they failed to build for other reasons :D) fixes rust-lang#138558 r? workingjubilee have fun
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It's bitflags in practice, so an enum is unsound, as an enum must only have the described values. The x86_64 psABI declares it as a
typedef int _Unwind_Action, which seems reasonable. I made a newtype first but that was more annoying than just a typedef. We don't really use this value for much other than a short check.I ran
x check library --target aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu,x86_64-pc-windows-gnu,x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx,x86_64-unknown-haiku,x86_64-unknown-fuchsi a,x86_64-unknown-freebsd,x86_64-unknown-dragonfly,x86_64-unknown-netbsd,x86_64-unknown-openbsd,x86_64-unknown-redox,riscv64-linux-android,armv7-unknown-freebsd(and some more but they failed to build for other reasons :D)fixes #138558
r? workingjubilee have fun