Skip to content

Atomic Read/Write API for KeyValueAccess #202

Description

@cmhulbert

We should consider changing the API, removing lockForReading, lockForWriting, in favor of atomic read/writes.

@tpietzsch said elsewhere:

In general I would like to move to “atomic reads/writes” semantics rather then the locking semantics (which are file-system-centric, and the way we would implement atomic read/write for filesystem).

Originally posted by @bogovicj in #141

related: Investigate "Volatile" Reads for S3

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Projects

No projects

Milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions