-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
Open
Description
#203 has been merged but there are outstanding issues that need to be finalised, particularly when standardising across all of the formulas in our organisation (using the ssf-formula). Quoting the relevant comment here:
- [1] Use text-based instead of YAML-based comparison? including test(map): verify
map.jinjadump using_mapdatastate #203 (comment)
- No change required (at least for the time being): Just use text-based comparison and update the PRs in other formulas to do the same.
- [2] Set up
mapdatain_mapdata/init.sls
- No change required (at least for the time being): Merge as-is and resolve this when centralising the solution in the
ssf-formula.- [3] Remove
replacementfrom_mapdata_spec.rb? including test(map): verifymap.jinjadump using_mapdatastate #203 (comment)
- No change required (at least for the time being): I don't believe there will be many formulas that will need this so no need to add the extra layer of complexity; however, can be resolved when centralising the solution in the
ssf-formula.- [4] Use
controlscope for variables in InSpec?
- No change required (at least for the time being): Merge as-is and open up for further discussion; @n-rodriguez, do you know anything about this?
- [5] Change
commands=>command
- @baby-gnu, it would be better to get this fixed before merging; perhaps I can add a tiny commit to do this.
- [6] Use
InSpec shared resourcesacross all formulas?
- No change required (at least for the time being): Merge as-is and resolve this when centralising the solution in the
ssf-formula.- [7] Replace old
platform_fingerconcatenation with shared library method instead
- No change required (at least for the time being): Either resolve in an extra commit or leave for a subsequent PR.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels