-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathcomparison_analysis.py
More file actions
582 lines (451 loc) Β· 24.5 KB
/
Copy pathcomparison_analysis.py
File metadata and controls
582 lines (451 loc) Β· 24.5 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
"""
Unified Metrics Comparison
Convert ALL methods to RBA-theta format and apply SAME quality metrics
This ensures fair comparison using identical evaluation criteria
"""
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import time
import logging
from typing import Dict, List, Tuple
import warnings
warnings.filterwarnings('ignore')
# Import your core modules
import core.model as model
from core.cusum_method import run_cusum_analysis
from core.swrt_method import run_swrt_analysis
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO)
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
class UnifiedMetricsComparison:
"""
Convert ALL method outputs to RBA-theta format and apply SAME quality metrics
This ensures true apples-to-apples comparison
"""
def __init__(self, data: pd.DataFrame, nominal_power: float = None):
self.data = data
# Auto-calculate nominal if not provided
if nominal_power is None:
turbine_cols = [col for col in data.columns if col.startswith('Turbine_')]
self.nominal_power = data[turbine_cols].max().max() if turbine_cols else data.max().max()
print(f"π Auto-calculated nominal power: {self.nominal_power:.2f} MW")
else:
self.nominal_power = nominal_power
# Validate data
self.turbine_columns = [col for col in data.columns if col.startswith('Turbine_')]
if not self.turbine_columns:
raise ValueError("No turbine columns found!")
self.results = {}
self.runtime_stats = {}
self.unified_events = {} # All methods in RBA format
def run_all_methods(self, config: Dict = None) -> Dict:
"""Run all 4 methods and get their raw outputs"""
logger.info("π Running all 4 methods...")
if config is None:
config = model.tune_mixed_strategy(self.data, self.nominal_power)
# 1. Run RBA-theta (both traditional and MCMC)
logger.info("π§ Running RBA-theta...")
start_time = time.time()
rba_results = model.RBA_theta(self.data, self.nominal_power, config, "unified_rbatheta.db")
sig_trad, stat_trad, sig_mcmc, stat_mcmc, tao = rba_results
rba_runtime = time.time() - start_time
# Store RBA results
self.results['rba_traditional'] = {
'significant_events': sig_trad,
'stationary_events': stat_trad,
'total_events': len(sig_trad) + len(stat_trad)
}
self.results['rba_mcmc'] = {
'significant_events': sig_mcmc,
'stationary_events': stat_mcmc,
'total_events': len(sig_mcmc) + len(stat_mcmc)
}
self.runtime_stats['rba_traditional'] = rba_runtime / 2 # Split runtime
self.runtime_stats['rba_mcmc'] = rba_runtime / 2
logger.info(f"β
RBA-Traditional: {len(sig_trad) + len(stat_trad)} events")
logger.info(f"β
RBA-MCMC: {len(sig_mcmc) + len(stat_mcmc)} events")
# 2. Run CUSUM
logger.info("π§ Running CUSUM...")
start_time = time.time()
cusum_events = run_cusum_analysis(self.data)
cusum_runtime = time.time() - start_time
self.results['cusum'] = {
'events': cusum_events,
'total_events': len(cusum_events)
}
self.runtime_stats['cusum'] = cusum_runtime
logger.info(f"β
CUSUM: {len(cusum_events)} events")
# 3. Run SWRT
logger.info("πͺοΈ Running SWRT...")
start_time = time.time()
swrt_events = run_swrt_analysis(self.data, self.nominal_power)
swrt_runtime = time.time() - start_time
self.results['swrt'] = {
'events': swrt_events,
'total_events': len(swrt_events)
}
self.runtime_stats['swrt'] = swrt_runtime
logger.info(f"β
SWRT: {len(swrt_events)} events")
return self.results
def convert_all_to_rba_format(self):
"""
Convert CUSUM and SWRT outputs to RBA-theta format
This allows applying the SAME quality metrics to all methods
"""
logger.info("π Converting all outputs to RBA-theta format...")
# RBA methods are already in correct format
self.unified_events['rba_traditional'] = {
'significant_events': self.results['rba_traditional']['significant_events'],
'stationary_events': self.results['rba_traditional']['stationary_events']
}
self.unified_events['rba_mcmc'] = {
'significant_events': self.results['rba_mcmc']['significant_events'],
'stationary_events': self.results['rba_mcmc']['stationary_events']
}
# Convert CUSUM to RBA format
self.unified_events['cusum'] = self._convert_cusum_to_rba_format()
# Convert SWRT to RBA format
self.unified_events['swrt'] = self._convert_swrt_to_rba_format()
logger.info("β
All methods converted to unified RBA format")
def _convert_cusum_to_rba_format(self) -> Dict:
"""Convert CUSUM fault events to RBA-theta format"""
cusum_events = self.results['cusum']['events']
if cusum_events.empty:
return {
'significant_events': pd.DataFrame(),
'stationary_events': pd.DataFrame()
}
# Convert CUSUM faults to "significant events" format
rba_format_events = []
for idx, event in cusum_events.iterrows():
# Create RBA-style significant event
rba_event = {
't1': event.get('start_time', 0),
't2': event.get('end_time', 0),
'βt_m': event.get('end_time', 0) - event.get('start_time', 0),
'βw_m': event.get('magnitude', 0), # Use CUSUM magnitude
'ΞΈ_m': np.pi/2 if event.get('magnitude', 0) > 0 else -np.pi/2, # Estimate direction
'Ο_m': abs(event.get('magnitude', 0)) * 0.1 # Estimate standard deviation
}
rba_format_events.append(rba_event)
# All CUSUM events are treated as "significant" (fault detection)
significant_df = pd.DataFrame(rba_format_events)
stationary_df = pd.DataFrame() # CUSUM doesn't detect stationary periods
return {
'significant_events': significant_df,
'stationary_events': stationary_df
}
def _convert_swrt_to_rba_format(self) -> Dict:
"""Convert SWRT ramp events to RBA-theta format"""
swrt_events = self.results['swrt']['events']
if swrt_events.empty:
return {
'significant_events': pd.DataFrame(),
'stationary_events': pd.DataFrame()
}
# Convert SWRT ramps to "significant events" format
rba_format_events = []
for idx, event in swrt_events.iterrows():
# Create RBA-style significant event
rba_event = {
't1': event.get('start_time', 0),
't2': event.get('end_time', 0),
'βt_m': event.get('duration', 0),
'βw_m': event.get('magnitude', 0) if event.get('event_type', '') == 'ramp_up' else -event.get('magnitude', 0),
'ΞΈ_m': np.pi/4 if event.get('event_type', '') == 'ramp_up' else -np.pi/4, # Ramp direction
'Ο_m': abs(event.get('magnitude', 0)) * 0.05 # Estimate standard deviation
}
rba_format_events.append(rba_event)
# All SWRT events are treated as "significant" (ramp detection)
significant_df = pd.DataFrame(rba_format_events)
stationary_df = pd.DataFrame() # SWRT doesn't detect stationary periods
return {
'significant_events': significant_df,
'stationary_events': stationary_df
}
def calculate_unified_quality_metrics(self) -> Dict:
"""
Apply the EXACT SAME quality metrics from your sensitivity analysis to ALL methods
Now we can directly compare quality scores across all 4 methods!
"""
logger.info("π Calculating unified quality metrics (SAME for all methods)...")
unified_metrics = {}
for method_name in ['rba_traditional', 'rba_mcmc', 'cusum', 'swrt']:
if method_name not in self.unified_events:
continue
method_events = self.unified_events[method_name]
sig_events = method_events['significant_events']
stat_events = method_events['stationary_events']
# Apply YOUR EXACT quality calculation to all methods
try:
# Use the same quality metrics calculation from your model
quality_results = model.calculate_event_quality_metrics(sig_events, stat_events)
# Extract the same metrics as your sensitivity analysis
if isinstance(quality_results, dict):
sig_quality = quality_results.get('significant_events', {}).get('overall_quality_score', 0)
stat_quality = quality_results.get('stationary_events', {}).get('overall_quality_score', 0)
overall_balance = quality_results.get('overall', {}).get('balance_score', 0)
else:
# Fallback calculation
sig_quality = self._calculate_fallback_quality(sig_events)
stat_quality = self._calculate_fallback_quality(stat_events)
overall_balance = self._calculate_balance_score(sig_events, stat_events)
except Exception as e:
logger.warning(f"Quality calculation failed for {method_name}: {e}")
sig_quality = self._calculate_fallback_quality(sig_events)
stat_quality = self._calculate_fallback_quality(stat_events)
overall_balance = self._calculate_balance_score(sig_events, stat_events)
unified_metrics[method_name] = {
'total_events': len(sig_events) + len(stat_events),
'significant_events': len(sig_events),
'stationary_events': len(stat_events),
'sig_quality': sig_quality,
'stat_quality': stat_quality,
'balance_score': overall_balance,
'runtime': self.runtime_stats.get(method_name, 0)
}
return unified_metrics
def _calculate_fallback_quality(self, events_df: pd.DataFrame) -> float:
"""Fallback quality calculation if main calculation fails"""
if events_df.empty:
return 0.0
if 'βt_m' not in events_df.columns or 'βw_m' not in events_df.columns:
return 0.5 # Neutral score for missing data
# Simple quality based on consistency
durations = events_df['βt_m'].values
magnitudes = events_df['βw_m'].abs().values
if len(durations) < 2:
return 0.5
# Lower coefficient of variation = higher quality
dur_cv = np.std(durations) / np.mean(durations) if np.mean(durations) > 0 else 1
mag_cv = np.std(magnitudes) / np.mean(magnitudes) if np.mean(magnitudes) > 0 else 1
avg_cv = (dur_cv + mag_cv) / 2
quality_score = max(0, min(1, 1 - avg_cv/2))
return quality_score
def _calculate_balance_score(self, sig_events: pd.DataFrame, stat_events: pd.DataFrame) -> float:
"""Calculate balance score same as your sensitivity analysis"""
total_events = len(sig_events) + len(stat_events)
if total_events == 0:
return 0.0
sig_ratio = len(sig_events) / total_events
# Same calculation as your sensitivity analysis
balance_score = 1.0 - abs(sig_ratio - 0.5) * 2
return max(0, balance_score)
def generate_unified_comparison_report(self, unified_metrics: Dict):
"""Generate report with SAME metrics for all methods"""
print("\n" + "="*100)
print("UNIFIED 4-WAY COMPARISON REPORT")
print("SAME QUALITY METRICS APPLIED TO ALL METHODS")
print("="*100)
# Event count comparison
print(f"\nπ EVENT COUNT COMPARISON:")
print("-" * 80)
print(f"{'Method':<20} {'Total Events':<15} {'Change from RBA-Trad':<20} {'Runtime (s)':<15}")
print("-" * 80)
baseline_events = unified_metrics.get('rba_traditional', {}).get('total_events', 1)
method_names = {
'rba_traditional': 'RBA-Traditional',
'rba_mcmc': 'RBA-MCMC',
'cusum': 'CUSUM',
'swrt': 'SWRT'
}
for method, display_name in method_names.items():
if method in unified_metrics:
total = unified_metrics[method].get('total_events', 0)
change = ((total - baseline_events) / baseline_events * 100) if baseline_events > 0 else 0
runtime = unified_metrics[method].get('runtime', 0)
print(f"{display_name:<20} {total:<15} {change:+6.1f}% {runtime:<15.2f}")
# UNIFIED QUALITY COMPARISON - SAME METRICS FOR ALL!
print(f"\nπ― UNIFIED QUALITY COMPARISON (SAME METRICS FOR ALL):")
print("-" * 100)
print(f"{'Method':<20} {'Sig Events':<12} {'Stat Events':<12} {'Sig Quality':<12} {'Stat Quality':<12} {'Balance':<10}")
print("-" * 100)
for method, display_name in method_names.items():
if method in unified_metrics:
data = unified_metrics[method]
print(f"{display_name:<20} {data.get('significant_events', 0):<12} "
f"{data.get('stationary_events', 0):<12} {data.get('sig_quality', 0):<12.3f} "
f"{data.get('stat_quality', 0):<12.3f} {data.get('balance_score', 0):<10.3f}")
# Quality ranking
print(f"\nπ QUALITY RANKING:")
print("-" * 50)
# Rank by significant event quality
sig_quality_ranking = sorted(unified_metrics.items(),
key=lambda x: x[1].get('sig_quality', 0), reverse=True)
print("Significant Event Quality Ranking:")
for i, (method, data) in enumerate(sig_quality_ranking, 1):
quality = data.get('sig_quality', 0)
print(f" {i}. {method_names[method]}: {quality:.3f}")
# Rank by balance score
balance_ranking = sorted(unified_metrics.items(),
key=lambda x: x[1].get('balance_score', 0), reverse=True)
print("\nBalance Score Ranking:")
for i, (method, data) in enumerate(balance_ranking, 1):
balance = data.get('balance_score', 0)
print(f" {i}. {method_names[method]}: {balance:.3f}")
# Key insights
print(f"\nπ‘ KEY INSIGHTS (FAIR COMPARISON):")
print("-" * 40)
# RBA enhancement analysis
if 'rba_mcmc' in unified_metrics and 'rba_traditional' in unified_metrics:
mcmc_quality = unified_metrics['rba_mcmc']['sig_quality']
trad_quality = unified_metrics['rba_traditional']['sig_quality']
quality_improvement = ((mcmc_quality - trad_quality) / trad_quality * 100) if trad_quality > 0 else 0
print(f"β’ RBA-MCMC quality improvement: {quality_improvement:+.1f}%")
print(f"β’ Quality scores: Traditional {trad_quality:.3f} vs MCMC {mcmc_quality:.3f}")
# Compare with baselines
if 'cusum' in unified_metrics and 'swrt' in unified_metrics:
cusum_quality = unified_metrics['cusum']['sig_quality']
swrt_quality = unified_metrics['swrt']['sig_quality']
print(f"β’ Baseline qualities: CUSUM {cusum_quality:.3f} vs SWRT {swrt_quality:.3f}")
# Compare RBA with baselines
if 'rba_mcmc' in unified_metrics:
rba_quality = unified_metrics['rba_mcmc']['sig_quality']
vs_cusum = ((rba_quality - cusum_quality) / cusum_quality * 100) if cusum_quality > 0 else 0
vs_swrt = ((rba_quality - swrt_quality) / swrt_quality * 100) if swrt_quality > 0 else 0
print(f"β’ RBA-MCMC vs CUSUM: {vs_cusum:+.1f}% quality difference")
print(f"β’ RBA-MCMC vs SWRT: {vs_swrt:+.1f}% quality difference")
# Performance vs quality trade-off
print(f"\nπ PERFORMANCE VS QUALITY TRADE-OFF:")
print("-" * 45)
for method, display_name in method_names.items():
if method in unified_metrics:
data = unified_metrics[method]
quality = data.get('sig_quality', 0)
runtime = data.get('runtime', 0)
events = data.get('total_events', 0)
efficiency = events / runtime if runtime > 0 else 0
quality_per_second = quality / runtime if runtime > 0 else 0
print(f"{display_name}:")
print(f" Quality: {quality:.3f}, Runtime: {runtime:.2f}s, Events/sec: {efficiency:.1f}")
print("\n" + "="*100)
return unified_metrics
def run_complete_unified_comparison(self, config: Dict = None) -> Dict:
"""Run complete comparison with unified metrics"""
logger.info("π Starting Unified 4-Way Comparison")
logger.info("=" * 60)
logger.info("Converting all outputs to RBA format for fair comparison")
total_start = time.time()
# Run all methods
self.run_all_methods(config)
# Convert to unified format
self.convert_all_to_rba_format()
# Calculate unified metrics
unified_metrics = self.calculate_unified_quality_metrics()
total_runtime = time.time() - total_start
# Generate report
self.generate_unified_comparison_report(unified_metrics)
return {
'results': self.results,
'unified_events': self.unified_events,
'unified_metrics': unified_metrics,
'runtime_stats': self.runtime_stats,
'total_runtime': total_runtime
}
def create_unified_comparison_plots(self, unified_metrics: Dict) -> plt.Figure:
"""Create plots comparing unified quality metrics"""
fig, ((ax1, ax2), (ax3, ax4)) = plt.subplots(2, 2, figsize=(16, 12))
method_names = ['RBA-Traditional', 'RBA-MCMC', 'CUSUM', 'SWRT']
method_keys = ['rba_traditional', 'rba_mcmc', 'cusum', 'swrt']
colors = ['#1f77b4', '#ff7f0e', '#2ca02c', '#d62728']
# 1. Unified Quality Comparison
available_methods = [name for key, name in zip(method_keys, method_names) if key in unified_metrics]
available_colors = [color for key, color in zip(method_keys, colors) if key in unified_metrics]
sig_qualities = [unified_metrics[key].get('sig_quality', 0) for key in method_keys if key in unified_metrics]
stat_qualities = [unified_metrics[key].get('stat_quality', 0) for key in method_keys if key in unified_metrics]
balance_scores = [unified_metrics[key].get('balance_score', 0) for key in method_keys if key in unified_metrics]
x = np.arange(len(available_methods))
width = 0.25
ax1.bar(x - width, sig_qualities, width, label='Significant Quality', alpha=0.8, color='lightblue')
ax1.bar(x, stat_qualities, width, label='Stationary Quality', alpha=0.8, color='lightcoral')
ax1.bar(x + width, balance_scores, width, label='Balance Score', alpha=0.8, color='lightgreen')
ax1.set_title('Unified Quality Metrics (SAME calculation for all)')
ax1.set_ylabel('Quality Score (0-1)')
ax1.set_xticks(x)
ax1.set_xticklabels(available_methods, rotation=45)
ax1.legend()
ax1.set_ylim(0, 1)
ax1.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
# Add value labels
for i, (sig, stat, bal) in enumerate(zip(sig_qualities, stat_qualities, balance_scores)):
ax1.text(i - width, sig + 0.02, f'{sig:.3f}', ha='center', va='bottom', fontsize=8)
ax1.text(i, stat + 0.02, f'{stat:.3f}', ha='center', va='bottom', fontsize=8)
ax1.text(i + width, bal + 0.02, f'{bal:.3f}', ha='center', va='bottom', fontsize=8)
# 2. Event Count vs Quality
total_events = [unified_metrics[key].get('total_events', 0) for key in method_keys if key in unified_metrics]
ax2.scatter(total_events, sig_qualities, c=available_colors, s=200, alpha=0.7)
for i, method in enumerate(available_methods):
ax2.annotate(method, (total_events[i], sig_qualities[i]),
xytext=(5, 5), textcoords='offset points', fontsize=10)
ax2.set_xlabel('Total Events Detected')
ax2.set_ylabel('Significant Event Quality')
ax2.set_title('Event Count vs Quality Trade-off')
ax2.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
# 3. Runtime vs Quality
runtimes = [unified_metrics[key].get('runtime', 0) for key in method_keys if key in unified_metrics]
ax3.scatter(runtimes, sig_qualities, c=available_colors, s=200, alpha=0.7)
for i, method in enumerate(available_methods):
ax3.annotate(method, (runtimes[i], sig_qualities[i]),
xytext=(5, 5), textcoords='offset points', fontsize=10)
ax3.set_xlabel('Runtime (seconds)')
ax3.set_ylabel('Significant Event Quality')
ax3.set_title('Runtime vs Quality Trade-off')
ax3.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
# 4. Quality Ranking
quality_ranks = list(range(1, len(available_methods) + 1))
sorted_indices = sorted(range(len(sig_qualities)), key=lambda i: sig_qualities[i], reverse=True)
sorted_methods = [available_methods[i] for i in sorted_indices]
sorted_qualities = [sig_qualities[i] for i in sorted_indices]
sorted_colors = [available_colors[i] for i in sorted_indices]
ax4.barh(quality_ranks, sorted_qualities, color=sorted_colors, alpha=0.8)
ax4.set_yticks(quality_ranks)
ax4.set_yticklabels(sorted_methods)
ax4.set_xlabel('Significant Event Quality')
ax4.set_title('Quality Ranking (Highest to Lowest)')
ax4.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
# Add value labels
for i, quality in enumerate(sorted_qualities):
ax4.text(quality + 0.01, i + 1, f'{quality:.3f}', va='center', fontsize=10)
plt.tight_layout()
return fig
def run_unified_comparison(data_file: str, config: Dict = None):
"""
Main function to run unified comparison with SAME metrics for all methods
"""
print("π― Unified 4-Way Comparison")
print("=" * 50)
print("Applying SAME quality metrics to ALL methods")
print("Fair comparison using unified RBA-theta format")
print()
# Load data
print(f"π Loading data from: {data_file}")
if data_file.endswith('.xlsx') or data_file.endswith('.xls'):
data = pd.read_excel(data_file)
else:
try:
data = pd.read_csv(data_file, encoding='utf-8')
except UnicodeDecodeError:
data = pd.read_csv(data_file, encoding='latin-1')
print(f"π Data loaded: {data.shape[0]} samples, {data.shape[1]} turbines")
# Initialize comparison
comparison = UnifiedMetricsComparison(data)
# Run unified comparison
results = comparison.run_complete_unified_comparison(config)
# Create plots
print("\nπ Creating unified comparison plots...")
fig = comparison.create_unified_comparison_plots(results['unified_metrics'])
# Save results
plt.savefig('unified_four_way_comparison.png', dpi=300, bbox_inches='tight')
print("π Plot saved as: unified_four_way_comparison.png")
plt.show()
return results, comparison
if __name__ == "__main__":
print("π― Unified Metrics Comparison")
print("=" * 40)
print("This ensures ALL methods are evaluated using")
print("the EXACT SAME quality metrics as RBA-theta")
print()
print("Benefits:")
print("β’ Fair comparison across all methods")
print("β’ Same quality calculation for all")
print("β’ Direct ranking of method performance")