Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Hi @yaronmaz, Thank you for your interest in PyPGx. Integrating external SV/CNV calls into the PyPGx pipeline has been asked a few times previously (see #56, #95, and #158). Long story short, it's easier said than done. Theoretically, if you can build a mapping table between external SV/CNV calls and PyPGx calls—such as |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
I know that NGS flow that starts with BAM can calculate PGX by calling SNV and CNV Coverage and its working great.
What about the flow that the user has SNV VCF and SV/CNV VCF with potential relevant calls. Is there an option to call for PGX with the VCF(s) (can combine them of course as well) that will take into account the CNV/SV calls as well? or is it limited to only the SNV variants?
I saw the chip option, we have scenarios where we have ThermoFisher VCF that has already the CNV reads as well as the SNV ones, and I wonder how I can utilize pyPGX to properly call for PGX results.
thanks
Yaron
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions