Skip to content

Conversation

@EmmaRenauld
Copy link
Contributor

  • Sent some parts into functions
  • Added a lot of comments

@frheault , I still have a question. Can you check the todo at line 329?

@EmmaRenauld EmmaRenauld requested a review from frheault December 2, 2025 19:13
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 72.97297% with 20 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 72.65%. Comparing base (ad967d5) to head (baf2a57).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1288      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.59%   72.65%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         294      294              
  Lines       25339    25332       -7     
  Branches     3546     3538       -8     
==========================================
+ Hits        18395    18404       +9     
+ Misses       5448     5440       -8     
+ Partials     1496     1488       -8     
Flag Coverage Δ
smoketests 69.83% <72.97%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
unittests 13.29% <1.35%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
Scripts 75.56% <79.41%> (+0.12%) ⬆️
Library 69.19% <67.50%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant