Replace 'bind-utils' with 'bind9.18-utils'

[phracek]

Replace 'bind-utils' with 'bind9.18-utils'

See Jira issue https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-80345

It is valid only for RHEL9

[github-actions]

Pull Request validation

Failed

🔴 Review - Missing review from a member (1 required)

Success

🟢 CI - All checks have passed

[github-actions]

Testing Farm results

name	compose	arch	status	started (UTC)	time	logs
CentOS Stream 9 - 1.22-micro	CentOS-Stream-9	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 08:01:48	5min 12s	test pipeline
CentOS Stream 9 - 1.24	CentOS-Stream-9	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 08:01:55	7min 23s	test pipeline
CentOS Stream 9 - 1.26	CentOS-Stream-9	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 08:01:48	5min 30s	test pipeline
CentOS Stream 10 - 1.26	CentOS-Stream-10	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 08:01:56	4min 36s	test pipeline
Fedora - 1.26	Fedora-latest	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 08:01:49	7min 45s	test pipeline
RHEL9 - Unsubscribed host - 1.24	RHEL-9.4.0-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 11:25:00	11min 34s	test pipeline
RHEL9 - Unsubscribed host - 1.20	RHEL-9.4.0-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 11:25:00	11min 8s	test pipeline
RHEL9 - Unsubscribed host - 1.22	RHEL-9.4.0-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 11:24:59	11min 10s	test pipeline
RHEL9 - Unsubscribed host - 1.26	RHEL-9.4.0-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 09:43:29	12min 20s	test pipeline
RHEL9 - 1.20	RHEL-9.4.0-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 09:43:29	13min 27s	test pipeline
RHEL9 - 1.24	RHEL-9.4.0-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 09:43:29	13min 24s	test pipeline
RHEL9 - 1.22	RHEL-9.4.0-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 09:43:29	14min 17s	test pipeline
RHEL9 - 1.26	RHEL-9.4.0-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 09:43:29	14min 36s	test pipeline
RHEL8 - 1.24	RHEL-8.10.0-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 09:43:29	16min 22s	test pipeline
RHEL9 - OpenShift 4 - 1.20	RHEL-9.4.0-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 09:55:17	18min 3s	test pipeline
RHEL8 - 1.22	RHEL-8.10.0-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 09:43:29	15min 48s	test pipeline
RHEL8 - 1.22-micro	RHEL-8.10.0-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 09:43:30	17min 24s	test pipeline
RHEL10 - 1.26	RHEL-10-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 09:43:29	13min	test pipeline
RHEL9 - OpenShift 4 - 1.26	RHEL-9.4.0-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 09:57:20	18min 47s	test pipeline
RHEL9 - OpenShift 4 - 1.24	RHEL-9.4.0-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 09:57:05	19min 45s	test pipeline
RHEL9 - OpenShift 4 - 1.22	RHEL-9.4.0-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 09:57:19	20min 48s	test pipeline
RHEL8 - OpenShift 4 - 1.22	RHEL-8.10.0-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 09:57:38	23min 15s	test pipeline
RHEL8 - OpenShift 4 - 1.24	RHEL-8.10.0-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 09:58:48	22min 28s	test pipeline
RHEL10 - OpenShift 4 - 1.26	RHEL-10-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 09:58:06	17min 55s	test pipeline
RHEL8 - OpenShift 4 - 1.22-micro	RHEL-8.10.0-Nightly	x86_64	✅ passed	24.03.2025 09:58:40	23min 45s	test pipeline

[phracek]

[test][test-openshift]

[SlouchyButton]

Why the switch from smaller set of modules to nginx-all-modules, since it's not mentioned in PR nor in commit message.

Is it an unrelated change just 'hidden' in the PR, or mistake, or required for the bind-utils change?

[phracek]

Why the switch from smaller set of modules to nginx-all-modules, since it's not mentioned in PR nor in commit message.

Is it an unrelated change just 'hidden' in the PR, or mistake, or required for the bind-utils change?

@SlouchyButton See PR here #326. I did not want to create a separate PR. But I will definitely add a comment into commit message. I have missed it. Good point.