Description
I encountered a problem when using dummy_irs() and Matlab's resample()
function together. resample()
does not work properly when the to be resampled vector does not contain some zeros at the start and end. This happens since we moved the impulse to the first sample in commit 4b50bd7.
An example where this matters: Simulating the impulse response of a linear WFS array with ir_wfs()
leads to ripples in the frequency response below the aliasing frequency (in this case about 850 Hz). Setting conf.delayline.resampling = 'none'
shows the expected behaviour.
SFS_start
SOFAstart
conf = SFS_config;
conf.N = 5000;
%secondary sources
conf.secondary_sources.geometry = 'line';
conf.secondary_sources.size = 10;
conf.secondary_sources.number = 51;
hrtf = dummy_irs(conf);
%wfs
conf.wfs.hprefhigh = 20000;
conf.xref = [0 -3 0];
%interpolation, delaying, weighting
conf.ir.hrirpredelay = 0; %pre-delay in samples
conf.delayline.resampling = 'matlab';
conf.delayline.resamplingfactor = 100;
conf.delayline.filter = 'integer';
[ir,x0] = ir_wfs(conf.xref,pi/2,[0 3 0],'ps',hrtf,conf);
%plot
N = length(ir(:,1));
f = (0:N-1)/N*conf.fs;
TF = fft(ir(:,1));
figure
semilogx(f,db(abs(TF)))
grid
set(gca,'XLim',[20 conf.fs/2])
xlabel('frequency / Hz'), ylabel('dB')
My suggestion would be to move the position of the dirac in dummy_irs()
to e.g. sample 101 (from my experience the resample()
problem is not noticable for this value) and then the additional delay can be substracted by setting conf.ir.hrirpredelay = 100
if this is important to the user for time alignment of stimuli. This procedure would be in accordance with the handling of predelays in HRTF/BRIRs.