Skip to content

Naming scheme for dimensions in function headers #142

Open
@hagenw

Description

@hagenw

As discussed in #141 we have some inconsistencies in the description of dimension length in the function header.
For example

%       x0      - position  and direction of secondary sources [N0x7] / m
%       d       - matrix of driving signals [NxN0]

in driving_function_imp_nfchoa() as opposed to

%       x0      - positions and directions of secondary sources / m [nx6]
%       d       - driving signals [mxn]

in driving_function_imp_wfs().

We should agree on a common naming scheme and create a pull request in order to fix this.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions