Skip to content

What level of support should be provided for static resources? #47

@justinwb

Description

@justinwb

From the specification:

An { ST rdfs:label L } arc indicates that there is at most one corresponding managed resource R in STI and it has the name L. L is a static resource.

To what extent should shape trees provide abilities (like the above) to express and validate static resources? Should we do it at all? Do we do it too little?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    questionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions