-
|
I need to install Talos on some industrial device (MiTAC MB1-10AP) which has a GPIO plugin, which Debian identifies as using the pinctrl-broxton and optionally the pinctrl-intel drivers. My question is, should I consider doing the work as a patch to https://github.com/siderolabs/extensions ? I see there's a contrib tier, but not sure what would be accepted or not. In addition,. If acceptable, should I build this as I couldn't find which specific GPIO drivers are built into Pi and other SBC images. Maybe there are other places to include these drivers? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
|
just as separate for now or you could also do a meta extension that pulls in both, so have different options to select from, PR's are welcome |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'm confused about the different patterns (?) for extensions; I had a PR that enables some new vanilla kernel drives/ modules. Am I correct to think, such an addition does not need an extension (in the sense that you can add it via the factory), but only need to enable the drivers? Adding a layer through the factory would only be needed for out of tree extra modules? If that is not correct: My PR was merged before the 1.12 release, but that new driver is not listed in the factory. Maybe extensions have a separate release workflow, and that wasn't done yet? The implemented patches are siderolabs/pkgs#1388 and siderolabs/extensions#907 Looking at the digest list in e.g. Looking at It seems I'm missing some step to have this built into the full eco-system? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I guess it was a mis-merge at some point, but we'll get it back for v1.12.2