Request for correction: Biomni entry in OpenSciFlow AI-for-science workflow map

[kkkniengLiu]

Hi Biomni maintainers,

I am maintaining an early open initiative called OpenSciFlow: https://github.com/OpenSciFlow

We are building a small, correction-friendly map of AI-for-science agents, workflow engines, plugin manifests, and local/HPC execution patterns. Biomni is currently listed as a biomedical AI agent and a high-priority reference for biomedical workflow/plugin interoperability:

• Map: https://github.com/OpenSciFlow/awesome-ai4s-workflows
• Agent category page: https://github.com/OpenSciFlow/awesome-ai4s-workflows/blob/main/categories/agents.md

This is not a request for support, adoption, or collaboration commitment. I am opening this only to ask whether the entry is accurate enough.

Specific corrections that would help:

1. Is "biomedical AI agent" a fair short classification?
2. Should Biomni be described primarily as an agent framework, a biomedical research assistant, a benchmark/tool ecosystem, or something else?
3. Are there specific safety, clinical-use, or reproducibility boundaries we should mention when referencing Biomni?
4. Is there a better canonical repo, docs page, citation, or paper link we should use?

If GitHub issues are not the right place for this, please feel free to close it. A short correction comment is enough; I can make the change on the OpenSciFlow side.