IDL: [WIP] update to use codama macros #180
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustopian
changed the title
rustopian
changed the title
rustopian
commented
Nov 18, 2025
| > = { | ||
| programAddress: Address<TProgram>; | ||
| accounts: { | ||
| /** Stake account to be updated */ |
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using Codama gen, I believe these comments would have to be added by a custom hand-written visitor for each instruction. I'm considering proposing a Codama feature that allows them to be generated just as Anchor did with desc on accounts, which would restore them here.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[WIP]
Most of the diff is generated code - CI demands it
Problem
Client generation uses a lot of fragile manual scripting.
Solution
Update to using Codama macros.