Skip to content

Layer mediaType choice? #256

Open
Open
@jonjohnsonjr

Description

@jonjohnsonjr

Looking at the spec, I'm curious about the decision to use application/vnd.module.wasm.content.layer.v1+wasm as the layer's mediaType. Two points:

  1. The +wasm suffix isn't registered with IANA, so it's unclear what this means.
  2. The application/wasm MIME type seems to have been already decided by w3 (see here), why not use this?

As a bonus question, it doesn't appear that application/wasm is registered with IANA, are you aware of any plans to do so? (That's more of an ecosystem decision and not specific this repo, but it might be work poking some folks.)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    questionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions