Skip to content

Do we need to distinguish between TaggedObjectNode and DataModel #582

@WilliamJamieson

Description

@WilliamJamieson

Now that the internal tags have been removed. Going forward the only tagged objects are in fact DataModel objects. It may make sense to eventually move all the TaggedObjectNode functionality directly in DataModel and have DataModel directly inherit from DNode So that we can get rid of the several pass through methods. This would also mean that asdf.open will simply give you a datamodel rather than having to go through rdm.open (which does more that asdf.open) to get a datamodel to work with.

Note that we can get around "static code" issues by creating some type stubs, which should actually be fairly easy if we can parse all the schemas for a given model into a single "super" schema like what has been proposed in spacetelescope/rad#659

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions