Warning and advisement classes not documented

[mattgarrish]

I stumbled across the warning class in the translated EPUB specifications, but can't find it documented in the respec manual.

Could someone confirm if it's still appropriate to use; i.e., is it just an oversight in the documentation?

I have the same question about the advisement class, too. Is it safe to use and is it considered a level lower than a warning, or is it a replacement for warning?

[marcoscaceres]

These are actually part of the W3C's base styles (ultimately, ReSpec should only style it's own UI and not the document itself, which is left to the standards organization using ReSpec):

For .note, .example, and .advisement, please see:
https://github.com/w3c/tr-design/

We should probably update the docs regardless to point to the https://github.com/w3c/tr-design/ and explain the above.

[mattgarrish]

These are actually part of the W3C's base styles

Ah, okay, I wasn't aware there were organization-specific styles.

For .note, .example, and .advisement, please see: https://github.com/w3c/tr-design/

Thanks, I'll have a look. Some mention in the docs would definitely be helpful, too, as I can't find any mention of those style sheets in any of the W3C editing resources (but the scattering of info is a complaint to for W3C!).

[xfq]

FWIW - there are some docs (comments) in https://github.com/w3c/tr-design/blob/gh-pages/src/base.css