Replies: 3 comments
-
I vote yes. For a user it's weird and annoying to prepend the package name to every function. They can do something like |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It sounds appealing, but what do we do with code that's in sub directories? Do we call I am happy with making the namespace nicer, but only if we can find a robust set of rules to decide which prefixes are kept in the name and which are replaced by a namespace. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Indeed, that can get really messy really quickly. I know there was a will to clear up namespaces in |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This is a discussion to follow-up on a problem highlighted first in Issue #25:
from spm import *
is not a recommended syntax. However,import spm
leads to the pedanticspm.spm_
notation for allspm
functions. Should we simply remove the prependingspm_
when wrapping the code?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions