Skip to content

Support explicit expectation of no worker running #653

Open
@0legg

Description

@0legg

Right now there is no easy way to expect that some particular worker is not running during the given render step. There is a workaround to use requireExplicitWorkerExpectations, but it requires to specify the footprint for the rest of the workers.

Proposal: add methods like expectNoWorker/expectNoWorkerOutputting that will do the work complementary to expectWorker/expectWorkerOutputting by checking non-existence of a single worker with specific footprint.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions